FACTORS AFFECTING RESPIRATION COMPLAINTS IN PARAQUAT WORKERS IN PALM OIL PLANTATIONS IN KALIMANTAN, 2022

 

L. Meily Kurniawidjaja1, Sofi Kumala Dewi2

Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

meily.bobo@gmail.com1, Sofi_kumala_dewi@yahoo.com2

 

KEYWORDS

ABSTRACT

paraquat, sprayer, respiratory complaint, 5-5 prevention pack model.

The study analyzed the relationship between the dependent variable (respiratory complaints) and the independent variables (worker characteristics, occupational characteristics, exposure intensity, and prevention of respiratory disorders) in paraquat sprayers in oil palm plantations in Kalimantan in 2022. The study design was a cross-sectional, analytical-descriptive quantitative study using a questionnaire instrument conducted online from August to October 2022. The total sample is 189 worker respondents and ten management respondents. The bivariate analysis was Chi-Square 2x2 for variables with p</=0.25 values, followed by multivariate logistic regression tests using the backward method. The study results found that 13.22% had respiratory complaints, 11.11% had complaints of cough, 3.17% coughed with phlegm, 2.11% had shortness of breath, and 1.05 had asthma. The results of the multivariate analysis show smoking habits have a risk of 4x (p 0.006), OR 4.12 (1.50-11.32)), permanent workers have a risk of 3x (p-value 0.022, OR 2.98 (1.16-7) .64)), and the use of inadequate PPE has a risk of 4.77x (p 0.002, OR 4.77 (1.78 - 12.80)). No significant relationship was found in the analysis of efforts to prevent respiratory disorders and respiratory complaints. This research implies that it can serve as a foundation for formulating better policies regarding the usage of paraquat in agriculture. It can also help raise awareness about the environmental impact of pesticide usage, such as paraquat.

DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v2i8.86

 

Corresponding Author: L. Meily Kurniawidjaja

E-mail: meily.bobo@gmail.com

 

 

INTRODUCTION

National development has created jobs and expanded job opportunities for workers who will provide income to meet the necessities of life for themselves and their families (Djunaidi & Alfitri, 2022)—increasing workability and income, always facing health problems, accidents, disabilities, and even death (Iftitah, 2017). Therefore, promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative occupational health services are needed to create healthy and productive workers (Agustina, 2016).

Ministry of Agriculture data for 2017-2021 shows that there has been an expansion of the area of oil palm plantations from 14,048,722 (Ha) in 2017 to 15,081,021 (Ha) with a 2018-2019 growth rate of 0.91%. The expansion of the plantation area was followed by an increase in palm oil production from 37,965,224 (tons) in 2017 to 49,710,345 (tons) in 2021, with a growth rate of oil palm production in 2018-2019 of 9.88%. Productivity (kg/ha) has also increased, with a growth rate of 8.42% in 2018-2019. The data above can describe the growth of the oil palm plantation sector in Indonesia, which is increasing rapidly and has made Indonesia one of the countries with the largest palm oil producers in the world (Indonesia, 2021).

From an economic perspective, palm oil is a foreign exchange earner for Indonesia; 80% of domestic palm oil production is exported to various countries. The palm oil industry can provide an increase in foreign exchange which continues to increase from year to year; data for 2019-2020 shows an increase in the total value of exports (billions of USD) from 20.2 in 2019 to 23.0 in 2020 and 36.2 in 2021. Based on unit export value (USD/ton), there was also an increase from 541.1 in 2019 to 675.4 in 2020 and 1,046.9 in 2021 (Monitor, 2020).

Paraquat, as a non-selective pesticide, is one of the most widely used pesticides due to its affordable price. Paraquat is classified as a class I toxic substance, a class of bipyridyl (1,1-dimethyl-4, 4-bipyridinium) pesticides that impact humans through the respiratory, digestive, skin, and eye mucosa. In Indonesia, paraquat is classified as a limited pesticide in terms of its use; its use must have maximum efficiency with minimal impact on humans, living things, and the environment. Restricted pesticides require special requirements and safety equipment other than those listed on the label. They can only be used by certified users issued by the head of the service carrying out functions in the agricultural sector in the Regency/City (Fitriyani, 2019). Limited pesticide use must be explicitly regulated to minimize impacts on humans and the environment (Pertanian, 2013).

Occupational lung disease is an artificial disease that can be prevented by preventing respiratory disorders (Halajur, 2019). Model 5-5 Prevention of workers' health problems is carried out through primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Primary prevention includes efforts to maintain and improve worker safety and health status and specific protection according to the hazards found in the workplace (Kurniawidjadja et al., 2021). Secondary prevention is done through early diagnosis and optimal treatment. Tertiary prevention with disability limitation and rehabilitation. (Kurniawidjadja et al., 2019) .

The results of a 2011 study on paraquat pesticide sprayers in South Kalimantan found a prevalence of restriction lung disorder of 7.24% (Dewi SK, 2011) and a prevalence of respiratory complaints of 15.22% (Dewi SK, 2011). A significant relationship was found between work period and restrictive lung disorder (95% CI 1.11 -- 73.12); respondents with a working period ≥13 months had nine times the risk of experiencing restrictive lung disorder compared to respondents with a working period <13 months, and there is exposure with high intensity in all respondents with a calculated score of exposure intensity of 24. This study aims to analyze the implementation of prevention efforts and the factors that influence respiratory complaints from paraquat exposure to sprayers in oil palm plantations in Kalimantan in 2022. Therefore, the benefits of this research include an increased awareness of worker safety, which can provide better insights into the health risks faced by workers in oil palm plantations exposed to paraquat. These findings can also assist in formulating and implementing improved and more effective workplace safety policies in oil palm plantations.

 

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional design, a quantitative analytic study to examine the factors of Model 5-5 Control Efforts on paraquat sprayers against respiratory complaints. The research was conducted at the Kalimantan Oil Palm Plantation. Data collection was carried out through online instruments from August to October 2022. Validity and reliability tests were carried out on the instrument with valid and reliable results. The analysis was carried out as a univariate descriptive of the characteristics of the respondents and Control Efforts Model 5-5, bivariate on the factors Control Efforts Model 5-5 respondents to respiratory complaints using Chi-Square 2x2. The multivariate test was carried out on a bivariate test with a p>0.25 value. Factors with a p-value <0.05 in the multivariate test were found to be significantly related to respiratory complaints.

Based on the sample size formula used, the sample size for testing the hypothesis in the proportion of 2 populations obtained a sample size of 181 working respondents. The total sample was 189 worker respondents; 9 were excluded because the questionnaire data was incomplete. The sampling technique in this study used a non-probability technique, namely quota sampling; the inclusion criteria were workers spraying paraquats on oil palm plantations in Kalimantan with a minimum of 6 (six) months of work, the exclusion criteria were respondents who already had respiratory problems based on a doctor's diagnosis before working at the current company and are not willing to fill out the questionnaire completely. To get an overview of Control Efforts Model 5-5, a sample was taken from 10 management-level respondents in a palm oil company.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This study involved 189 respondents; the analysis results show that Most of the respondents were female (50.3%). Most working age groups are between 26 - 35 years and 36 - 25 years. The majority of the respondents who participated were married (82.5%). Most of the respondents' physical activities did not exercise (53.4%). Most respondents did not smoke (83.1%), all female respondents did not smoke (100%), 34.0% of male respondents smoked, and 66.0% of male respondents did not smoke. History of the respondent's disease in the last three months, most of the respondents did not have a history of lung disease, heart and blood vessel disease, and bone disease in the thoracic cavity and spine. Most respondents' assessment of healthy work patterns on the indicators of knowledge related to procedures was good (76.2%). The indicators of work procedures were also primarily good (69.8%), but there were still quite a few that were not good enough. Almost all workers stated that they were aware of the potential hazards in the workplace as a sprayer.

Table 1. Frequency of Worker Characteristics

Variable

n-189

%

Gender

Woman

Man

 

95

94

 

50,3

49,7

Age group

18-25 years

26-35 years

36-45 years

46-55 years

>55 years

 

37

59

59

31

3

 

19,6

31,2

31,2

16,4

1,6

Marital status

Single

Marry

 

33

156

 

17.5

82.5

Formal education

Tall

Intermediate

Base

 

11

49

129

 

5,8

25,9

68.3

Income

>UMR

=UMR

<UMR

 

10

141

38

 

5,3

74,6

20,1

Nutritional status

Good nutritional status

More nutritional status

Poor nutritional status

 

133

42

14

 

70,4

22,2

7,4

Sports Habits

Yes

No

 

88

101

 

46,6

53,4

Smoking habit

Do not smoke

Yes smoking

 

157

32

 

83,1

15,9

Lung disease

No

Yes

Diseases of the heart and blood vessels

No

Yes

Diseases of the thoracic cavity and spine

No

Yes

 

188

1

 

189

0

 

188

1

 

99.5

0.5

 

100.0

0

 

99.5

0.5

Healthy Work Patterns

Respondents' knowledge regarding procedures

Good (≤4)

Less (>4)

Application of work procedures

Good (≤5)

Less (>5)

 

 

132

57

 

144

45

 

 

69.8

30,2

 

76,2

23,8

Paraquat Hazard Knowledge

Yes

No

 

185

4

 

97.9

2,1

 

The following is a table of the distribution of respiratory complaints for the last three months among workers in Kalimantan Oil Palm Plantations. Assessment of respiratory disorders using a modified questionnaire from The American Thoracic Society (ATS) respiratory disease questionnaire for adults ATS-DLD-78.

Table 2. Respiratory Complaints in Workers (n= 189)

Respiratory Complaints

Yes

No

n

%

n

%

Respondents who have respiratory complaints

25

13,22

164

86,78

Consultation with complaints of respiratory problems experienced by respondents in the last 3 (three) months

3

1.58

186

98.42

Cough nearly every day (4-7 days/week) for three months or more

21

11,11

168

88,89

Cough with phlegm from the chest cavity (not from the nasal cavity) occurring most days (4-7 days/week) for three consecutive months or more

6

3,17

183

96,83

Shortness of breath most days (4-7 days/week) for three months or more

4

2,11

185

97.89

Asthma disease ever diagnosed by a doctor while the respondent was working at the current workplace.

2

1.05

187

98.95

Chronic bronchitis ever diagnosed by a doctor while the respondent was working at the current workplace.

1

0.52

188

99.48

The study found that in the last three months, most respondents had no respiratory complaints (86.78%). However, 25 people (13.22%) experienced one or more complaints. The most common complaint was coughing, which occurred every day for the last three months, as much as 11.11%. The results of the analysis found that the average age of the workers who became respondents was 36 years, the youngest worker was 19 years old, and the oldest was 65 years old, the average respondent's BMI was 23.16 (good nutritional status), most of them were secondary education, the average income of respondents meet UMR standards. The healthy work pattern variable consists of indicators of respondents' knowledge regarding spraying work procedures and the application of work procedures; scoring is carried out, then divided into two excellent and poor categories based on the mean value.


 

Table 3. Job Characteristics

Variable

n=189

%

Type of work

Foreman

Sprayer

 

6

183

 

3,2

96.8

Employment status

Permanent worker/monthly salary

Casual Daily Worker (BHL)

 

51

138

 

27.0

73.0

Length of working

>1 year

≤1 year

 

124

65

 

65,6

34,4

The job characteristics of the respondents showed that most of them were sprayers (96.8%), the majority (73%) were casual daily workers (BHL), and the majority of respondents (65.6%) had worked for > 1 year. The intensity of exposure can be seen from several variables, namely work assignments, use of PPE, and safe working methods. The results of the exposure intensity scoring showed that most of the respondents had carried out their duties well (60.3%), most of the respondents had used PPE properly (85.2%), and some of the respondents had worked well (59.3%).

Table 4. Exposure Intensity Scoring

Variable

n=189

%

Job Tasks

Good (≤10)

Less (>10)

 

114

75

 

60,3

39,7

Using PPE

Good (≤5)

Less (>5)

 

161

28

 

85,2

14,8

How to Work Safely

Good (≤4)

Less (>4)

 

158

31

 

83.6

16,4

 

Prevention of Respiratory Disorders Model 5-5 results of the management questionnaire.

All respondents answered that they had carried out hazard communication, healthy work patterns, healthy lifestyles, training, work procedures, implementation supervision, availability of first aid kits, checking of first aid kits, trained first aid workers, company clinics, referral health facilities, checks before returning to work and treatment checks. Advanced. 30% of clinics can be reached within <15 minutes, 90% carry out MCU, 80% have pulmonary function examination (spirometry), 40% have chest X-ray examination, 90% have referral transportation, and a small proportion has carried out periodic job rotations (30%). Management respondents could not be researched by analyzing the relationship to respiratory complaints.

Prevention of Respiratory Disorders Model 5-5 results of workers' questionnaires

Efforts to control the prevention of PAK Model 5-5 have been going well, where 99.5% have received PPE, 87% have received spirometry examination facilities, 98% have received health facilities if they have a work accident, and 91% have received compensation for PAK. Respondents who received spirometry examination facilities had lower respiratory complaints (11.5%) than respondents who did not have spirometry examination facilities (25%). Respondents who received compensation guarantees had lower respiratory complaints (11%) than respondents who did not have compensation guarantees (37.5%). Multivariate analysis was performed on the spirometry examination facility variable (p=0.1) and compensation guarantee variable (p=0.009); the results of the multivariate analysis found no significant relationship between the spirometry examination facility variable and the compensation guarantee variable on respiratory complaints.

Table 5. Prevention of AIDs Prevention Model 5-5 of Management (n=10)

Variable

Yes

No

n

%

n

%

Health Promotion

Hazard Communication

Healthy Work Patterns

Healthy lifestyles

Training

 

10

10

10

10

 

100

100

100

100

 

0

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

Specific Protection

Fit Work Program

MCU check

Lung Function Examination

X-ray examination

Work procedures

Executor Supervision

Supervision Sanctions

Job Rotation

PPE

PPE Use Practices

Availability of PPE

PPE cleaning

 

 

9

8

4

10

10

6

3

 

8

7

8

 

 

90

80

40

100

100

60

30

 

80

70

80

 

 

1

2

6

0

0

4

7

 

2

3

2

 

 

10

20

60

0

0

40

70

 

20

30

20

Early Diagnosis and Optimal Treatment

First Aid at Work

Availability of first aid

First aid affordability

Periodic First Aid Examination/ Checking

Availability of First Aid Officers

Trained First Aid Officer

Medical Facility

Clinic Availability

Clinic Affordability

o   <15 minutes

o   15-30 minutes

 

 

10

7

10

9

10

 

10

 

3

7

 

 

100

70

100

90

100

 

100

 

30

70

 

 

0

3

0

1

0

 

0

 

7

3

 

 

0

30

0

10

0

 

0

 

70

30

Defect Prevention

Health Facilities and Referrals

Referral Transportation

 

10

9

 

100

90

 

0

1

 

0

10

Return to Work Program

Post Accident Recovery Service Facility

Post-Illness Service Facility

Doctor Examination Before Returning to Work

Continuing Care Physician Examination

 

9

9

10

10

 

90

90

100

100

 

1

1

0

0

 

10

10

0

0

 


 

Table 6. Prevention of CAH Model 5-5 from Workers (n = 189)

Variable

Yes

No

n

%

n

%

Obtain PPE to avoid hazards as a sprayer

188

99.5

1

0.5

There is a spirometry examination facility related to the dangers of working as a sprayer

165

87.3

24

12,7

There are health facilities when there is a work accident

186

98.4

3

1,6

There is a guarantee of compensation if there is a respiratory disorder as a result of working as a sprayer

173

91.5

16

8,5

Table 7 is a bivariate test. A multivariate test was carried out on 14 variables which in the bivariate analysis had p<=0.25 with the logistic regression test of the predictive model. In the final step of the multivariate analysis, three variables related to respiratory complaints were obtained: smoking habits, employment status, and use of PPE. The group with smoking habits has a risk factor of 4.12x exposure to respiratory complaints than the non-smoker group. In employment status as permanent workers/monthly salary, the risk is 2.98x exposure to respiratory complaints compared to the Casual Daily Workers (BHL) group. The employment status is interesting because permanent employees/monthly salaries are more at risk than casual daily workers. This can be seen in the condition of permanent workers/monthly salary; the percentage of cases of respiratory complaints is high for employees with >1 year of service (23.5%) compared to employees with >1 year of service in the Casual Daily Workers group (10%). In the group of workers lacking in using PPE, there is a 4.77x risk of exposure to respiratory complaints compared to the group that uses PPE properly.

Table 7. Bivariate Test

 

Respiratory Complaints

p-value

OR

 

95% CI

No

Yes

n

%

n

%

Gender

Woman

Man

 

86

78

 

90.5

83.0

 

9

16

 

9,5

17.0

 

0.12*

 

1,960

1

 

0.819 – 4.689

Age

≤36 years old

>36 years

 

80

84

 

83.3

90.3

 

16

9

 

16,7

9,7

 

0.15*

 

0.536

1

 

0.224 – 1.281

Marital status

Single

Marry

 

25

139

 

75.8

89.1

 

8

17

 

24,2

10,9

 

0.05*

 

0.382

1

 

0.149 – 0.98

Education

High-Intermediate

Base

 

48

116

 

80.0

89.9

 

12

13

 

20

10,1

 

0.061*

 

0.448

1

 

0.191 – 1.053

Income

≥UMR

<UMR

 

130

34

 

86.1

89.5

 

21

4

 

13,9

10.5

 

0.58

 

0.728

1

 

0.234 – 2.263

Nutritional status

Normal Nutrition

Abnormal Nutrition

 

118

46

 

88.7

82,1

 

15

10

 

11,3

17,9

 

0.22*

 

1,710

1

 

0.717 – 4.081

Sports Habits

Yes

No

 

73

91

 

83.0

90,1

 

15

10

 

17.0

9,9

 

0.14*

 

0.535

1

 

0.227 – 1.260

Smoking habit

No

Yes

 

141

23

 

89.8

71.9

 

16

9

 

10,2

28,1

 

0.01*

 

3,448

1

 

1.262 – 8.722

Lung Disease

No

Yes

Heart

No

Yes

Chest Bone Abnormalities

No

Yes

 

164

0

 

164

0

 

164

0

 

87,2

0

 

86.8

0

 

87,2

0

 

24

1

 

25

0

 

24

1

 

12,8

100

 

13,2

0

 

12,8

100.0

 

0.13*

 

 

-

 

 

0.13*

 

0.128

1

 

-

1

 

0.128

1

 

0.88 – 0.185

 

 

 

 

 

0.88 – 0.185

Knowledge Healthy Work Patterns

Good (≤4)

Less (>4)

Procedure

Good (≤5)

Less (>5)

 

114

50

 

127

37

 

86.4

87.7

 

88.2

82,2

 

18

7

 

17

8

 

13,6

12,3

 

11,8

17,8

 

0.80

 

 

0.30

 

0.887

1

 

1.615

1

 

0.348 – 2.257

 

 

0.656 – 4.040

Paraquat Hazard Knowledge

Yes

No

 

161

3

 

87.0

75.0

 

24

1

 

13.0

25.0

 

0.43

1

 

2,236

 

0.223 – 22.380

Type of work

Foreman

Sprayer

Employment status

Permanent Worker/Monthly Salary

Casual Daily Worker (BHL)

 

4

160

 

39

125

 

66,7

87.4

 

76.5

90.6

 

2

23

 

12

13

 

33,3

12,6

 

23.5

9,4

 

0.18*

 

 

0.01*

 

 

0.288

1

 

0.338

1

 

0.55 – 1.659

 

 

0.143 – 0.801

Length of working

>1 year

≤1 year

 

107

57

 

86.3

87.7

 

17

8

 

13,7

12,3

 

0.78

 

0.883

1

 

0.359 – 2.172

Job Tasks

Good

Not enough

 

100

64

 

87.7

85,3

 

14

11

 

12,3

14,7

 

0.63

 

1.228

1

 

0.525 – 2.872

Using PPE

Good

Not enough

 

146

18

 

90.7

64,3

 

15

10

 

9,3

35,7

 

0.00*

 

1

5,407

 

2.116 – 13.816

How to Work Safely

Good

Not enough

 

140

24

 

88.6

77,4

 

18

7

 

11,4

22,6

 

0.14*

1

 

1

2,269

 

0.856 – 6.011

*significantly related

Table 8 . Logistic Regression Multivariate Test

 

Coefficient

SE

Wald

Df

p-value

OR

95% CI

Habit

Smoke

Do not smoke

 

1.41

 

0.51

 

7.55

 

1

 

0.006*

 

4,12

1

 

1.50 - 11.32

Employment status

Permanent Labor

BHL

 

1.09

 

0.47

 

5,21

 

1

 

0.022*

 

2.98

1

 

1.16 - 7.64

Use PPE

Not enough

Good

 

1.56

 

0.50

 

9.67

 

1

 

0.002*

 

4.77

1

 

1.78 - 12.80

Constant

-2.98

0.40

55,51

1

0.0

0.15

 

*significantly related

For significant values of p <0.25, a multivariate test was performed. Gender in this study was followed by a multivariate test (p = 0.12); it was seen that women had a 1.96x chance of not experiencing respiratory complaints from men. Of female workers, 50.3% were respondents for the gender with many respiratory complaints, namely men (64%). In Santosa WRB's research, Gayatri PR, 2020 stated that gender differences affect lung capacity and respiratory performance. Women have a smaller diffusion area than men with the same lung size, which can lead to poor respiratory performance and lung function (Santosa & Gayatri, 2020).

The multivariate test was continued for the age group with respiratory complaints (p=0.15). The age group ≤36 years has a protection factor of 0.53x for not experiencing respiratory complaints compared to the age group >36 years. The age group that experienced the most respiratory problems was ≤36 years old (64%). In Moon's 2015 study, there was no significant relationship between age and paraquat poisoning, p = 0.980 (Moon & Chun, 2015).

Only a small proportion of respondents had the habit of smoking (15.9%); there were no female respondents who had the habit of smoking, and 34.0% of the male respondents had the habit of smoking. The prevalence of smoking habits in this study was lower compared to the research (Ahmad, 2021) ; (Profiles, 2017). Smoking habits were followed by a multivariate test (p=0.006). The group with smoking habits has a 4.12x chance of experiencing respiratory complaints compared to the non-smoker group. Smokers risk 2.6x asthma, 1.7x chronic bronchitis, 4.0x chronic cough, 1.4x persistent wheezing, and 2.2x shortness of breath (Schenker et al., 2013). There is no significant relationship between age and paraquat poisoning p=0.98. There is no significant relationship between cardiovascular disease and paraquat poisoning p = 0.377

Bivariate analysis for variables with a p </ =0.25 value was followed by a multivariate logistic regression test using the backward method. Based on the multivariate test results, there are variables related to respiratory complaints, namely smoking habits, type of work, and use of PPE. Smoking habits have a risk of 4x ( p 0.006), OR 4.12 (1.50-11.32), permanent workers have a risk of 3x ( p-value 0.022, OR 2.98 (1.16-7.64)), and the use of PPE is not good has a risk of 4.77x (p 0.002, OR 4.77 (1.78 - 12.80). No significant relationship was found in the variable efforts to prevent respiratory disorders and complaints.

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the analysis of respiratory complaints among workers in oil palm plantations over the past three months reveals several key findings. The majority of respondents (86.78%) reported no complaints, while the most prevalent issue was coughing, affecting 84% of respondents on a daily basis during the specified period. The characteristics of the workers indicated a relatively equal distribution of male and female respondents (50.3% each), with the age group of 26-45 years constituting the largest portion (62.4%). Additionally, 68.3% of respondents had primary education, 53.4% lacked regular exercise habits, 29.6% exhibited poor nutritional status, and 20.1% had income below the UMR.

The analysis identified prominent risk factors influencing the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Smoking habits, employment status, and the utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE) emerged as dominant risk factors, whereas not smoking and properly using PPE at work were protective factors.

Based on these findings, recommendations can be directed to both workers and companies. Workers are advised to take proactive steps to prevent respiratory issues by enhancing their knowledge, adopting healthy lifestyles involving regular exercise, balanced nutrition, adequate rest, stress management, and avoiding smoking and alcohol. They are also encouraged to establish healthy work patterns, acquaint themselves with potential workplace hazards, adhere to proper work procedures, and consistently use appropriate PPE. Smokers among the employees are encouraged to quit smoking through various methods, with the support of occupational health services.

For companies, it is recommended to improve efforts in preventing respiratory disorders by implementing a comprehensive strategy, including environmental assessments, a fit-to-work program, enhanced health education, educational programs on healthy living and work practices, improved PPE usage, periodic job rotation, reporting systems for respiratory complaints, and health surveillance. The provision of health facilities, smoking cessation clinics, high-protein meals, and strong management-worker collaboration in prevention programs are also emphasized. Implementing the RAPKPIEK method in Health Promotion at Work (PKDTK) and engaging with the principles of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) are suggested. Furthermore, the registration of all workers in the Employment Social Security Administration Agency (BPJS-TK) program is recommended to ensure protection against occupational diseases. Lastly, it is advised to enhance the competency of occupational health service personnel in diagnosing and reporting occupational diseases, while maintaining consistent engagement from management.

  

REFERENCES

Agustina, B. (2016). Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Pelayanan Kesehatan Tradisional Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 32(1), 82–98.

Ahmad, M. A. (2021). Gambaran Faktor Risiko Hipertensi Berdasarkan Derajat Hipertensi Di Puskesmas Samata. Media Kesehatan Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar, 16(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.32382/medkes.v16i2.2122

Djunaidi, D., & Alfitri, A. (2022). Dilema industri padat modal dan tuntutan tenaga kerja lokal. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221222

Fitriyani, F. R. (2019). Analisis Perilaku Petani Nanas pengguna Pestisida dalam Pemakaian Alat Pelindung diri (APD) di Desa Tanjung Medang Kecamatan Kelekar Kabupaten Muara Enim Tahun 2019. STIK Bina Husada Palembang.

Halajur, U. (2019). Promosi Kesehatan di tempat kerja. Wineka Media.

Iftitah, A. (2017). Peranan Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja dalam Perwujudan Cita Pembangunan Hukum Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi, 1. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v7i2.377

Indonesia, D. J. P. K. P. R. (2021). Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. Ditjenbun.Pertanian.Go.Id. https://ditjenbun.pertanian.go.id/template/uploads/2021/04/buku-statistik-perkebunan-2019-2021-OK.pdf

Kurniawidjadja, L. M., Ok, S., Martomulyono, S., Susilowati, I. H., KM, S., & KKK, M. (2021). Teori dan Aplikasi Promosi Kesehatan di Tempat Kerja Meningkatkan Produktivitas. Universitas Indonesia Publishing.

Kurniawidjadja, L. M., Ok, S., Ramdhan, D. H., KM, S., & KKK, M. (2019). Buku Ajar Penyakit Akibat Kerja dan Surveilans. Universitas Indonesia Publishing.

Monitor, T. R. P. (Palm O. A. S. I. (2020). Inklusifitas Ekonomi, Sosial dan Ekologi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit.

Moon, J. M., & Chun, B. J. (2015). The efficacy of high doses of vitamin C in patients with paraquat poisoning. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 30(8), 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327110385633

Pertanian, D. I. (2013). Direktorat Jendral Prasarana Dan Sarana Pertanian. Kementrian Pertanian “Pedoman Teknis Pembangunan Embung Pertanian.

Profile, P. S. H. F. B. (2017). Profil Perilaku Petani Hortikultura Penyemprot Pestisida dan Gangguan Fungsi Paru Obstruktif.

Santosa, W. R. B., & Gayatri, P. R. (2020). Pengaruh Jenis Kelamin dan Masa Kerja Terhadap Tingkat Ventilasi. Judika (Jurnal Nusantara Medika), 4(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.29407/judika.v4i2.15385

Schenker, M. B., Stoecklin, M., Lee, K., Lupercio, R., Zeballos, R. J., Enright, P., Hennessy, T., & Beckett, L. A. (2013). Pulmonary function and exercise-associated changes with chronic low-level paraquat exposure. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 170(7), 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200403-266OC 

 

https://jurnal.syntax-idea.co.id/public/site/images/idea/88x31.png

© 2023 by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).