COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET
AND MONO ANTIPLATELET AS NON-EMBOLIC ISCHEMIC STROKE THERAPY
Filipo David Tamara
Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
|
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
|
ischemic
stroke, dual antiplatelet, mono antiplatelet. |
Stroke
is a clinical syndrome of acute, focal neurological deficits associated with
vascular injury of the central nervous system. Stroke is not a single disease
but can be caused by various risk factors, processes, and disease mechanisms.
Ischemic stroke is the most common stroke, about 80-90% of all strokes. Based
on the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) states that the prevalence of
stroke that occurs in Indonesia is 10.9%, with the highest prevalence in the
Riau Islands (12.9%) and the lowest in Papua (4.1%). This literature is
written to compare the effectiveness of mono and dual antiplatelets as a
non-embolic ischemic stroke therapy. The method in this study was a
literature review that was searched using Pubmed, Google Scholar, Medline,
Ebsco, Hindawi, Science Direct, and Cochrane, published in the last ten years.
After obtaining the appropriate literature, the manuscript is written. Based
on the results of the study, dual antiplatelet administration was more
effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and cardiovascular events
in ischemic stroke patients when compared to mono antiplatelet. The
recommended dual antiplatelet drugs are Clopidogrel and Aspirin. Based on the
literature search, it can be concluded that dual antiplatelet administration
is more effective in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in stroke patients.
However, some literature states that dual antiplatelet administration must
still consider the potential increased risk of bleeding. |
|
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v2i7.70 |
|
Corresponding Author: Filipo David Tamara
E-mail: davidtamara017@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Stroke is an
acute clinical syndrome, a focal neurological deficit associated with vascular
injury (infarction, hemorrhage) of the central nervous system. Stroke is not a
single disease but can be caused by various risk factors, disease processes,
and mechanisms (Murphy
& Werring, 2020). Ischemic stroke is the most common type of
stroke, which is around 80-90% of all strokes (Johns
Hopkins University, 2023). According to the World
Health Organization (WHO), revealed that cerebrovascular events are the second
cause of mortality and the third cause of morbidity where the brain is in a
condition of lack of blood flow which results in cell death so that brain cells experience hypoxia which
causes neurological deficits (Albay et al., 2020).
From 1990 to 2019, the burden (in terms of an absolute
number of cases) increased substantially (70% increase in stroke incidence,
43.0% stroke-related deaths, 102.0% stroke prevalence, and 143.0% DALYs), with
most of the global stroke burden (86.0% deaths and 89.0% DALYs) are in low and
lower-middle-income countries (World Stroke Organization, 2022). The incidence of stroke in Asia is 116 to 483/100,000 per year (Suwanwela et al., 2016). Based on the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas), the prevalence of
stroke that occurs in Indonesia is 10.9%, with the highest prevalence in Riau
Islands (12.9%) and the lowest in Papua (4.1%) (Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia,
2018).
Antiplatelet
therapy is the mainstay for primary stroke prevention in patients with risk
factors and for prevention of recurrent stroke after a Transient Ischemic
Attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke. Two trials demonstrated a reduced risk of
recurrent ischemic stroke with Aspirin and Clopidogrel in combination versus
Aspirin monotherapy lasting 21 or 90 days (Grotta,
2018). Aspirin is an inhibitor of
cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and a modifier of the enzymatic activity of
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Unlike other NSAIDs, which bind reversibly, aspirin
binds to this enzyme irreversibly. Aspirin also blocks thromboxane A2 on
platelets in an irreversible way, preventing platelet aggregation (Arif
& Aggarwal, 2022). Clopidogrel
is an irreversible inhibitor of the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12
receptor. Inhibition of this receptor prevents downstream activation of the
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor complex, leading to reduced platelet
aggregation. Clopidogrel is an inactive prodrug
that requires enzymatic activation via various CYP enzymes, including CYP2C19
and CYP3A4, via a two-step bioactivation process (Beavers & Naqvi, 2022). Previous research stated that dual antiplatelets
(Clopidogrel and Aspirin) were safer and more effective in reducing stroke
recurrence and various vascular events in ischemic stroke patients when
compared to mono antiplatelets (Ye et al., 2019 ).
The 2018 American
Heart Association/ASA Guidelines for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke
recommend using dual antiplatelets in mild acute ischemic stroke and is known to have a variety of working mechanisms
that can prevent stroke more effectively compared to mono antiplatelet. (Powers
et al., 2018). To the best of our
knowledge, there have been no studies in Indonesia that specifically discuss
the effectiveness and safety of each researched antiplatelet agent. Therefore,
it is expected that this literature review can summarize the findings from
studies on mono and dual antiplatelet therapy. Based on the background
description above, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of mono and
dual antiplatelet as therapy for non-embolic ischemic stroke. The benefit of
this research is that it can help update treatment guidelines for non-embolic
ischemic stroke. Also, the results of this study can encourage further research
in terms of developing new therapies for non-embolic ischemic stroke.
METHODS
The method used
in this study is a traditional review. Evaluation of studies regarding dual and
mono antiplatelet comparisons in the treatment of non-embolic ischemic stroke
was searched through several literature sources, namely Pubmed, Google Scholar,
Medline, Ebsco, Hindawi, Science Direct, and Cochrane. The literature search
used the keywords ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet, and mono antiplatelet,
published within the last ten years. After finding a variety of appropriate
literature, literature writing begins. The literature will be compiled
according to a predetermined format, starting from the definition,
epidemiology, mechanisms, risk factors, pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, and
treatment of non-embolic ischemic stroke.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Non-embolic Ischemic Stroke
Stroke is an
acute clinical syndrome, a focal neurological deficit associated with vascular
injury (infarction, hemorrhage) of the central nervous system. Stroke is not a
single disease but can be caused by various risk factors, disease processes,
and mechanisms (Murphy
& Werring, 2020). A case-control study states
that risk factors for ischemic stroke are divided into modifiable and
non-modifiable factors. Modifiable risk factors are hypertension, diabetes
mellitus, smoking, regular physical activity, excessive alcohol consumption,
heart disease, stress, and psychosocial depression. Risk factors that cannot be
modified include age, sex, race/ethnicity, and genetics (Boehme
et al., 2017).
Disability-Adjusted
Life-Years Lost (DALYs) states that stroke remains the number two cause of
death and the third combined cause of death and disability in the world. The
estimated global cost of stroke is over US$721 billion. From 1990 to 2019, the
burden (in terms of an absolute number of cases) increased substantially (70%
increase in stroke incidence, 43.0% stroke death, 102.0% stroke prevalence, and
143.0% DALYs), with most of the global stroke burden (86.0% deaths and 89.0%
DALYs) are in low and lower-middle-income countries (World
Stroke Organization, 2022). The incidence of ischemic
and hemorrhagic stroke has increased over the last decade to 85–94 per 100,000
but is much higher (1151–1216 per 100,000) in persons >75 years of age. In
addition, 85% of all stroke deaths occur in low-income countries, accounting
for 87% of stroke-related disability-adjusted life years (Murphy & Werring, 2020).
The incidence of stroke in Asia is 116 to 483/100,000 per
year (Suwanwela et al., 2016). Based on an epidemiological study conducted by Murphy et al ., the
lowest stroke rates in Asia are in Japan (706.6/100,000 people) and Singapore (804.2/100,000
people), with lower rates also seen in Bangladesh and Bhutan. The highest rates
are in Mongolia (4,409.8/100,000 people) and Indonesia (3,382.2/100,000
people), with high rates also seen in Myanmar, Laos, North Korea, and Cambodia.
This is associated with the country's economic status, which significantly
impacts health technology advancement
(Venketasubramanian et al., 2017). Based on the 2018 Riskesdas, the prevalence of stroke in Indonesia
is 10.9%, with the highest prevalence in the Riau Islands (12.9%) and the
lowest in Papua (4.1%) (Ministry
of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, 2018).
Ischemic stroke
is the most common type of stroke (85%), which can be caused by Cerebral Small
Vessel Disease (CSVD), cardioembolism, and extensive artery disease
(atherosclerosis). The pathophysiology of ischemic stroke begins with
inadequate blood supply to focal areas of brain tissue. The central core of the
tissue progresses to death within minutes and is referred to as the area of
infarction. Tissue in the surrounding area, known as the penumbra, does not die
immediately and can recover with early reperfusion. More Adenosine Triphosphate
(ATP) is consumed than is produced in the reduced blood flow area, causing
decreased energy stores, ionic imbalances, and electrical disturbances. These
changes increased Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Nitric Oxide (NO). The
pathophysiological cascade will lead to cell membrane damage, cell lysis, and
cell death by necrosis or apoptosis. Microglia are immediately activated in the
ischemic area and extend into the penumbra, peaking 48 to 72 hours later,
persisting for several weeks and causing an increase in proinflammatory
cytokines, including ROS, NO, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha,
anti-inflammatory cytokines, and neurotrophic factor. The culmination of the
complex ischemic cascade initiated by acute stroke is the loss of neurons and
supporting structures (Kuriakose
& Xiao, 2020; Shatri & Senst, 2023).
Mechanism of antiplatelet action
Antiplatelet
therapy is the mainstay of therapy for primary stroke prevention in patients
with risk factors and for prevention of recurrent stroke after a transient
ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke. Two trials have conclusively
demonstrated a reduction in the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with the
combination of aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy, lasting 21
or 90 days. The 2018 American Heart Association/ASA guidelines for managing
acute ischemic stroke provide recommendations IIa for dual antiplatelets in
acute minor ischemic stroke (Grotta,
2018).
a. Aspirin
Aspirin, an acetate salicylate
(acetylsalicylic acid), is classified among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs). Aspirin is an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and a
modifier of the enzymatic activity of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Aspirin binds
to this enzyme irreversibly, unlike other NSAIDs (ibuprofen/naproxen), which
bind reversibly. Aspirin also blocks thromboxane A2 on platelets in an
irreversible way, preventing platelet aggregation (Arif
& Aggarwal, 2022; Hackam & Spence, 2019). The mechanism of action of aspirin varies according to the
dose. Low doses (usually 75 to 81 mg/day) can irreversibly acetate serine 530
cyclooxygenase (COX)-1. This effect inhibits the formation of platelets from
thromboxane A2, producing an antithrombotic effect. Moderate doses (650 mg to 4
g/day) inhibit COX-1 and COX-2, block prostaglandin (PG) production, and have
analgesic and antipyretic effects (Abramson,
2023).
b. Clopidogrel
Clopidogrel is an irreversible
inhibitor of the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Inhibition of
this receptor prevents downstream activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor complex, leading to reduced platelet aggregation. Clopidogrel is an
inactive prodrug that requires enzymatic activation via various CYP enzymes,
including CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, via a two-step bioactivation process. Genetic
polymorphisms to these enzymes may influence response to therapy. Typically, in
normal metabolism, the drug has a bioavailability of 50%, with only 15% of the
oral dose being active via esterase hydrolysis with CYP enzymes. Clopidogrel
actively inhibits platelets for the lifetime of platelets (7 to 10 days).
Platelet function can begin to return as new platelets are cycled, and a
complete return of function is often seen within five days (Beavers
& Naqvi, 2022).
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dual and Mono
Antiplatelets in the Treatment of Non-Embolic Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic stroke
is when the brain loses blood flow, resulting in hypoxia of brain cells,
causing cell death. This results in focal neurological deficits in the areas of
the brain that are damaged (Albay
et al., 2020). The effects of ischemic
stroke itself can result in high morbidity and mortality. Most of the effects
occur within the initial 48-72 hours after attack onset and on delayed recovery
of neurologic function. Patients who experience acute stroke, neurological damage,
and recurrent strokes at a later date are joint events with a poor prognosis,
so adequate treatment is needed to overcome this. Antiplatelets are standard
therapy for non-embolic ischemic stroke events (Hui
et al., 2022; Ye et al., 2019).
The 2018 American
Heart Association/ASA Guidelines for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke
recommend using dual antiplatelets in mild acute ischemic stroke. Dual
antiplatelet is known to have a variety of working mechanisms so that it can
prevent stroke more effectively compared to mono antiplatelet. Dual
antiplatelets have a synergistic effect by inhibiting different platelet pathways
for activation. Dual antiplatelet therapy of any combination drug with aspirin
significantly reduces stroke recurrence, cardiovascular complications, and
mortality (Powers
et al., 2018).
The study by
Albay et al . found that dual antiplatelets were more effective in reducing the
risk of stroke recurrence and combined cardiovascular events such as acute
coronary syndrome and heart-related death compared to monotherapy. The
combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin is a dual antiplatelet that is good for
preventing recurrent strokes, cardiovascular events, and preventing death. The
combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin carries the highest risk of bleeding
episodes. Another combination, namely Ticagrelor and Aspirin, has proven to be
a promising drug in reducing recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events.
However, the drawback is its safety profile regarding significant bleeding
events (Albay
et al., 2020). The same study conducted by
Wang et al . found that compared to mono antiplatelet, dual antiplatelet proved
to be more effective in reducing the incidence of stroke recurrence and other
vascular events but had a higher risk of causing bleeding. This is suspected to
be due to the higher loading
dose of Clopidogrel and the longer duration of treatment for dual antiplatelets
(Wang et al., 2018).
The study
conducted by Trifan et al . found that the treatment of mild and moderate acute
non-embolic ischemic stroke patients using dual antiplatelets was proven to
reduce the risk of stroke recurrence, composite stroke, and death. The side
effect of dual antiplatelet is increasing the risk of severe hemorrhagic
complications, which is influenced by the length of treatment and the type of
agent used. Short-term (≤30 days) treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel
combination started within three days of attack onset may reduce the risk of
stroke recurrence and death from any cause without increasing the risk of
significant bleeding. The combination of Aspirin and Ticagrelor for 30 days or
other dual antiplatelets for >30 days after stroke is indeed effective for
reducing the risk of stroke recurrence and combined events but significantly
increases the risk of significant bleeding (Trifan
et al., 2021). A study with similar
results was conducted by Lin et al . to compare mono antiplatelet and dual
antiplatelet in patients with ischemic stroke with evidence of extensive artery
atherosclerosis at 21 days. The pooled results show that compared to mono antiplatelet,
dual antiplatelet is significantly more effective in reducing ischemic stroke
recurrence without causing an increase in bleeding (Lin
et al., 2022).
The study
conducted by Brown et al . found that dual antiplatelet is more effective than
mono antiplatelet for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke and severe
cardiovascular events in mild to severe ischemic stroke patients. The use of
dual antiplatelet at the initial onset after a mild ischemic stroke must still
consider the potential increased risk of bleeding. The use of dual antiplatelets
for long-term secondary prevention is no better than mono antiplatelets, given
the risk of significantly increasing major bleeding (Brown
et al., 2021). The same study conducted by
Yang et al. showed that the combination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel was more
effective in treating ischemic stroke than mono antiplatelet. However, the risk
of bleeding would be relatively higher in treatment lasting more than one month
(Yang
et al., 2021).
Another study
conducted by Wong et al . states that using dual antiplatelets at the start of
treatment is effective in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence and other
vascular events when compared with mono antiplatelets (Wong
et al., 2013). The same study conducted by
Su et al . showed that using dual antiplatelet is more effective in dealing
with ischemic stroke events even though it affects a greater risk of bleeding.
The choice of dual antiplatelet must still consider the daily side effects in
clinical practice (Su et
al., 2015).
CONCLUSION
Ischemic stroke
is a condition in which the brain loses blood flow, resulting in hypoxia of
brain cells, causing cell death which can affect high morbidity and mortality
rates so that adequate treatment is needed. Antiplatelet is a drug indicated to
treat nonembolic ischemic stroke. Based on the literature review conducted, the recommended dual
antiplatelet drugs are Clopidogrel and Aspirin. The use of dual antiplatelets
has shown to be more effective in treating non-embolic ischemic strokes
compared to mono antiplatelets. However, the risk of bleeding must be taken
into consideration.
REFERENCES
Abramson,
S. B. (2023). Aspirin: Mechanism of action, major toxicities, and use in
rheumatic diseases.
Albay,
C. E. Q., Leyson, F. G. D., & Cheng, F. C. (2020). Dual versus mono
antiplatelet therapy for acute non-cardio embolic ischemic stroke or transient
ischemic attack, an efficacy and safety analysis-updated meta-analysis. BMC
Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12883-020-01808-Y/TABLES/2
Arif,
H., & Aggarwal, S. (2022). Salicylic Acid (Aspirin). StatPearls.
Beavers,
C. J., & Naqvi, I. A. (2022). Clopidogrel. Antiplatelet Therapy in
Cardiovascular Disease. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118493984.ch19
Boehme,
A. K., Esenwa, C., Elkind, M. S. V, Fisher, M., Iadecola, C., & Sacco, R.
(2017). Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention. Circulation Research.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398
Brown,
D. L., Levine, D. A., Albright, K., Kapral, M. K., Leung, L. Y., Reeves, M. J.,
Sico, J., Strong, B., & Whiteley, W. N. (2021). Benefits and Risks of Dual
Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A
Systematic Review for the 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in
Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000377
Grotta,
J. C. (2018). Antiplatelet Therapy after Ischemic Stroke or TIA. New England
Journal of Medicine.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJME1806043/SUPPL_FILE/NEJME1806043_DISCLOSURES.PDF
Hackam,
D. G., & Spence, J. D. (2019). Antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke and transient
ischemic attack: An overview of major trials and meta-analyses. Stroke.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023954
Hui,
C., Tadi, P., & Patti, L. (2022). Ischemic Stroke. Preoperative
Assessment: A Case-Based Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58842-7_33
Johns
Hopkins University. (2023). Types of Stroke.
Kementerian
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Laporan Riskesdas 2018 Nasional.pdf. In Lembaga
Penerbit Balitbangkes.
Kuriakose,
D., & Xiao, Z. (2020). Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present
Status and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21207609
Lin,
C. J., Tseng, T. Y., & Saver, J. L. (2022). Dual vs. mono antiplatelet
therapy for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with evidence of
large artery atherosclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology.
https://doi.org/10.3389/FNEUR.2022.923142/FULL
Murphy,
S. J., & Werring, D. J. (2020). Stroke: causes and clinical features. Medicine
(Abingdon, England : UK Ed.).
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MPMED.2020.06.002
Powers,
W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C.,
Becker, K., Biller, J., Brown, M., Demaerschalk, B. M., Hoh, B., Jauch, E. C.,
Kidwell, C. S., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Ovbiagele, B., Scott, P. A., Sheth, K. N.,
Southerland, A. M., Summers, D. V., & Tirschwell, D. L. (2018). 2018
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A
Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000158/FORMAT/EPUB
Shatri,
G., & Senst, B. (2023). Acute Stroke. StatPearls.
Su,
Y., Cheng, X., & Dong, Q. (2015). Dual Antiplatelet Therapy of Clopidogrel
and Aspirin in Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: Evidence and
Indications. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.
https://doi.org/10.1111/CNS.12419
Suwanwela,
N. C., Poungvarin, N., & Panel, the
A. S. A. (2016). Stroke burden and stroke care system in Asia. Neurology
India. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.178042
Trifan,
G., Gorelick, P. B., & Testai, F. D. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Using
Dual Versus Monotherapy Antiplatelet Agents in Secondary Stroke Prevention:
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Circulation.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053782
Venketasubramanian,
N., Yoon, B. W., Pandian, J., & Navarro, J. C. (2017). Stroke Epidemiology
in South, East, and South-East Asia: A Review. Journal of Stroke.
https://doi.org/10.5853/JOS.2017.00234
Wang,
Y., Yang, Y., Zhou, M., Zhong, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., & Liu, L. (2018).
Dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy for acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic
stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke
and Vascular Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1136/SVN-2018-000168
Wong,
K. S. L., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Leng, X., Mao, C., Tang, J., Bath, P. M. W.,
Markus, H. S., Gorelick, P. B., Liu, L., & Lin, W. (2013). Early dual
versus mono antiplatelet therapy for acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003187/-/DC1
World
Stroke Organization. (2022). WSO Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022.
Yang,
Y., Huang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2021). Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel
and/or aspirin for ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack An overview of
systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Medicine (United States).
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027804
Ye,
M. Bin, Chen, Y. L., Wang, Q., An, J., Ye, F., & Jing, P. (2019). Aspirin
plus clopidogrel versus aspirin mono-therapy for ischemic stroke: a
meta-analysis. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal : SCJ.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1620962
|
©
2023 by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication
under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA ) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -sa / 4 .0/ ). |