Prima Sesari Saraswati1*, Rokiah Kusumapradja2, Erry
Yudhya Mulyani3
Esa Unggul University,
Jakarta, Indonesia1,2,3
Email: prisesa1404@student.esaunggul.ac.id
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
service quality, marketing mix, patient satisfaction,
patient decisions |
The patient's choice of a service provider is critical
to the hospital's business success. A decline in patient visits, a gap
between the hospital's target market, and suboptimal service quality and
marketing strategies present significant risks. Consequently, delivering
high-quality services to meet patient expectations and ensure their
satisfaction is paramount. Satisfied patients are more likely to return for
future health services, reinforcing the hospital's reputation and market
position. This study investigates how service quality, the marketing mix, and
patient satisfaction collectively impact the decision to choose a place of
delivery at Hermina Serpong General Hospital. Research Implications: The
findings highlight the importance of service quality and a well-structured
marketing mix in enhancing patient satisfaction, which in turn significantly
influences the patient's decision-making process when selecting a healthcare
provider. These insights underscore the need for hospitals to invest in
improving service delivery and refining marketing strategies to better align
with patient needs and expectations. By doing so, hospitals can not only
increase patient satisfaction but also strengthen their competitive advantage
in the healthcare market. Research Methods: This study employs a quantitative
cross-sectional approach, utilizing a questionnaire for data collection from
190 patients selected through purposive sampling. The results demonstrate
that service quality and the marketing mix have a significant and positive
impact on patient satisfaction. Additionally, these factors, alongside
patient satisfaction, significantly and positively influence the patient's
decision to choose a hospital. Suggestions: To further enhance patient
satisfaction and attract more patients, the hospital has initiated several
programs, including classes for pregnant women, door-to-door services, online
consultations, and services for obtaining birth certificates and Child
Identity Cards. |
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v3i9.233 |
|
Corresponding Author: Prima Sesari Saraswati*
Email: prisesa1404@student.esaunggul.ac.id
INTRODUCTION
The
competition among hospitals to attract patients is intense, requiring them to
develop specific strategies to stay competitive in the healthcare industry
Based on the
performance achievement data of Hermina Serpong Hospital, it can be seen that
the quality of health services provided is not in accordance with the standards
or is below the target, especially in the BOR (Bed Occupancy Rate) which
reached 69.03% in 2020, then increased to 73.51% in 2021, but experienced a
drastic decrease in 2022 to 51.44%. Data from the Obstetrics and Gynecology
Polyclinic of Hermina Serpong Hospital shows that the number of patients
continues to decrease, from 1,767 patients in 2019, to 1,536 patients in 2021,
and in 2022 from January to March there were 363 patients with an estimate
until December that only reached 1,300 patients. This shows a significant
decrease in the number of patients every year. The difference between the
potential target of pregnant women patients and the number of patients achieved
is still quite large
To initially
identify the factors contributing to the decline in patient visits, the
researcher conducted a preliminary survey or direct interviews with several
patients. The findings from these interviews revealed various factors that
influenced patients' decisions to continue using the hospital's services
(revisit)
The perceived
quality of a product or service can influence a user's intention to make repeat
purchases. When the service or product provided surpasses consumer
expectations, it is viewed as ideal quality. Conversely, if the service or
product falls short of expectations, it is perceived as poor quality. A study
by Park et al. (2021) involving 540 clinic patients in South Korea found that
service quality significantly impacts patient satisfaction and their intention
to revisit. Similarly, Siripipatthanakul (2021) conducted a study on 352 clinic
patients in Thailand, revealing that aspects of service quality, including
Tangibles, Reliability, and Empathy, positively and significantly affect
patients' decisions to return for health services.
The marketing
mix is a collection of tools that companies can use to achieve their marketing
objectives in a target market. Jerome McCarthy's traditional marketing mix, as
described by Kotler & Keller
According to
Kotler and Keller
Despite
extensive research on these factors, there has been no in-depth analysis of how
service quality, marketing mix, and patient satisfaction specifically influence
the decision to choose a place of delivery, particularly in the context of
Hermina Serpong Hospital. This research fills that gap, offering a novel
perspective by examining these variables with patient satisfaction as an
intervening variable, thereby providing insights that have not been explored in
previous studies
The primary
objective of this study is to analyze the influence of service quality,
marketing mix, and patient satisfaction on the decision to choose a place of
delivery at Hermina Serpong General Hospital. By identifying the key factors
that contribute to patient satisfaction and decision-making, this research aims
to provide valuable insights for hospital management in improving service
quality and marketing strategies. The expected benefits of this study include
enhancing patient satisfaction, increasing patient loyalty, and ultimately
boosting the hospital's competitiveness in the healthcare industry
METHOD
This study was
conducted to determine the influence of service quality and marketing mix on
the decision to choose a place of delivery at Hermina Serpong Hospital, with
satisfaction as an intervening variable. The research design is quantitative
with a cross-sectional approach. The sampling method was carried out using the
non-probability sampling method in a purposive way. Data collection was carried
out using a questionnaire instrument consisting of Service Quality Variables
with the Dimensions of Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and
Empathy. by using the Likert scale (1-4), Variable Marketing Mix with the
Dimensions of Product, Price, Promotion, Place, People, Process, and Physical
Evidence) by using the Likert scale (1-4), Variable of Patient Satisfaction
with the Dimension of the outcome, continuity of care and availability with
using the Likert scale (1-4) and the Place Selection Decision Variable with the
dimension of problem recognition, information search, evaluation of
alternatives, purchase decision, and post-purchase behavior with Using Likert
Scale (1-4)
Inferential
Stadot data analysis was carried out to assess the significance of the
relationship between variables
Figure 1. Research Model
Sample
The number of
samples determined was 190 patients. The sampling technique was carried out by
purposive sampling with the criteria that the respondent was an ANC patient at
Hermina Serpong Hospital
Research Hypothesis
a) There
is a relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction at Hermina
Serpong Hospital
b) There
is a relationship between marketing mix and patient satisfaction at Hermina
Serpong Hospital
c) There
is a relationship between patient satisfaction and consideration of the
decision to choose a place of delivery at Hermina Serpong Hospital
d) There
is a relationship between the quality of service and the consideration of the
decision to choose a place of delivery at Hermina Serpong Hospital
e) There
is a marketing mix relationship and consideration of the decision to choose a
place of delivery at Hermina Serpong Hospital.
f) There
is a relationship between service quality, marketing mix, patient satisfaction
and consideration of the decision to choose a delivery place at Hermina Serpong
Hospital.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Respondent profiles
In this study,
as many as 190 patients of Hermina Serpong Hospital. Based on gender, 100% of
respondents are Women. Based on age groups, 16 people, or 8.42%, are 18-22
years old, 98 people, or 51.58%, are 23-30 years old, 36 people, or 40%, are
31-60 years old, and age > 60 years is non-existent. Based on the type of
work, it is dominated by private employees, namely 97 people or 51.05%, in the
2nd position of patients with the profession of housewives, which is as many as
45 people or 23.6%, in the 3rd position of Civil Servants 26 people or 13.68%,
self-employed as many as 21 people or 11.05%, others less than 10%. Based on your monthly income, less than Rp.
3,000,000 7 people or 3.68%, the group of patients with an income of Rp.
3,000,100 – 5,000,000 as many as 39 people 20.53%, Rp. 5,000,100 – 7,000,000 as
many as 54 people or 28.42% and Rp. 7,000,100 – 9,000,000 as many as 76 people
or 40%, > 9 million as many as 14 people or 7.37%.
Analysis of Partial Least Square -
structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS)
1) Determinant
Coefficient (R-Squared)
The R-squared
tilapia or determination coefficient explains how much the dependent variable
can be affected by the independent variable. The R-squared value ranges from 0
to 1 (0 ≤ R2 ≤ 1); the higher the R-squared value, the greater the
influence of the independent variable on the dependent variable. As a rule of
thumb, the R2 value > 0.75 (strong), R2 >0.50 (moderate), and R2 >0.25
(weak), but if the R-square value is found above 0.9, the model can be
considered overfit. (Sarstedt et al., 2017;
Table 1.
R-Squared Values
Dependent |
R Square
Adjusted |
Classification |
Patient Satisfaction |
0.501 |
Moderate |
Patient Decision |
0.648 |
Strong |
Source: Research Data Processing (2022)
Based on the
data presented in the table above, it can be seen that the R-squared value for
the patient satisfaction variable of 0.501 was obtained. This value explains
that the percentage of patient satisfaction can be explained by the quality of
service and marketing mix of 50.1%; the remaining (100%-50.1%) 49.9% is
influenced by other variables that are not in the model. The R-squared value
for the patient decision variable of 0.648 obtained the value explained that
the percentage of patient decision size can be explained by the variables of
patient satisfaction, service quality, and marketing mix of 64.8%, the
remaining (100%-64.8%) 35.2% is influenced by other variables that are not in
the model.
2) Hypothesis
Testing
The main part
of the analysis of the inner model or structural model in this study is to look
at the value of the path coefficient to find out the direction of influence
between the variables in the research model. It is said that there is a
positive and significant influence if the T-statistic value > T-table
(1.645) is at a significance level of 5% (alpha = 0.05); on the other hand, if
the T-statistic < T-table (1.645) then there is no significant influence
between the two variables (Ringle et al., 2015; Sarstedt et al., 2017). Table 5
below shows the results of PLS-SEM data processing for the determination of
hypothesis test results.
Figure 2. Hypothesis Test
Results
Table 2.
Results of Hypothesis Test
Standardized
Coefficient |
T-Statistics |
P-Value |
Result |
|
H1 |
0.470 |
4.076 |
0.000 |
Supported |
H2 |
0.271 |
2.518 |
0.006 |
Supported |
H3 |
0.322 |
2.415 |
0.008 |
Supported |
H4 |
0.354 |
3.217 |
0.001 |
Supported |
H5 |
0.216 |
1.894 |
0.029 |
Supported |
H6.a |
0.151 |
1.852 |
0.032 |
Supported |
H6.b |
0.138 |
2.865 |
0.002 |
Supported |
The Effect of Service
Quality on Patient Satisfaction
From the table
above, it is known that the t calculation for the service quality variable is
4.076 at a significance level of 0.000 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.470. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value is
0.000<0.05, it can be concluded that the service quality variable has a
positive and significant effect on patient satisfaction. Thus, the H1
hypothesis "There is a relationship between service quality and patient
satisfaction at Hermina Serpong Hospital" is accepted.
The Effect of Marketing
Mix on Patient Satisfaction
From the table
above, it is known that the t calculation for the marketing mix variable is
2.518 at a significance level of 0.006 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.271. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value is
0.006<0.05, it can be concluded that the marketing mix variable has a
positive and significant effect on patient satisfaction. Thus, the H2
hypothesis "There is a relationship between marketing mix and patient
satisfaction at Hermina Serpong Hospital" is accepted.
The Effect of Patient
Satisfaction on Patients' Decision to Choose a Hospital
From the table
above, it is known that the t calculation for the Patient Satisfaction variable
is 2.415 at a significance level of 0.008 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.322. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistically >1.645, and the p-value is
0.008<0.05, it can be concluded that the Patient Satisfaction variable has a
positive and significant effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital.
Thus, the H3 hypothesis "There is a relationship between patient
satisfaction and patient decision in choosing a hospital" is accepted.
The Influence of Service
Quality on Patients' Decision to Choose a Hospital
From the table
above, it is known that the t calculation for the service quality variable is
3.217 at a significance level of 0.001 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.354. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistically >1.645, and the p-value 0.001<0.05,
it can be concluded that the service quality variable has a positive and
significant effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital. Thus, the H4
hypothesis "There is a relationship between service quality and patient
decision in choosing a hospital" is accepted.
The Influence of Marketing
Mix on Patients' Decision to Choose a Hospital
From the table
above, it is known that the t calculation for the marketing mix variable is
1.894 at a significance level of 0.029 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.216. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value is 0.029
<0.05, it can be concluded that the marketing mix variable has a positive
and significant effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital. Thus,
the H5 hypothesis "There is a relationship between marketing mix and patient
decision in choosing a hospital" is accepted.
The Effect of Patient
Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable on the Relationship between Service
Quality and Patient Decision in Choosing a Hospital
Figure 3. Path Analysis
Hypothesis 6
a) Direct
effect = 0.354
b) Indirect
Effect = 0.151
c) Total
effect = Direct effect + Indirect effect = 0.354 + 0.151 = 0.505
d) Variance
accounted for (VAF) value = Direct effect / Total Effect = (0.354/ 0.505) =
0.701 or 70.1%
From the figure above, it is known that the p-value for the influence of
the patient satisfaction variable on the relationship between service quality
and patient welfare (indirect effect) is 0.032 with a regression coefficient
value (Path Coefficient) of +0.151. Because the path coefficient value is
positive and the p-value is 0.032<0.05, it can be concluded that the patient
satisfaction variable has a significant effect on the relationship between
service quality and patient well-being. The VAF value is 0.701 or 70.1% because
the VAF value is> 20%, so it can be concluded that patient satisfaction is a
mediating variable. Thus, the H6a hypothesis "There is a relationship
between service quality and patient decision in choosing a hospital through
patient health" is accepted.
The
Effect of Patient Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable on the Relationship
between Marketing Mix and Patient Decision in Choosing a Hospital
Figure 4
Path Analysis Hypothesis 6b
a) Direct
effect = 0.216
b) Indirect
Effect = 0.087
c) Total
effect = Direct effect + Indirect Effect = 0.216 + 0.087 = 0.303
d) Variance
accounted for (VAF) value = Direct effect / Total Effect = (0.216 / 0.303) =
0.713 or 71.3%
From the
figure above, it is known that the p-value for the influence of the patient
satisfaction variable on the relationship between the marketing mix and patient
retention (indirect effect) is 0.038 with a regression coefficient value (Path
Coefficient) of +0.087. Because the path coefficient value is marked positively
and the p-value is 0.038<0.05, it can be concluded that the patient
satisfaction variable has a significant effect on the relationship between
marketing mix and patient well-being. The VAF value is 0.729 or 72.9% because
the VAF value is> 20%, so it can be concluded that patient satisfaction is a
mediating variable. Thus, the H6b hypothesis, "the relationship between
the marketing mix and the patient's decision to choose a hospital through
patient intelligence," is accepted.
The effect of service quality on
patient satisfaction
The results of
the research show that the t-value for the service quality variable is 4.476 at
a significance level of 0.000 with a regression coefficient value (Path
Coefficient) of +0.470. Because the path coefficient value is marked positively,
the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value is 0.000<0.05, it can be
concluded that the service quality variable has a positive and significant
effect on patient satisfaction. Thus, the H1 hypothesis "There is a
relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction at Hermina
Serpong Hospital" is supported. This means that the better the service
quality that patients get, the more significant the impact on increasing
patient satisfaction
The results of
this study were showed that to increase patient satisfaction, it is necessary
to improve the quality of service by increasing Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness,
Assurance, and Empathy
The results of
this study corroborate the theory of Parasuraman et al.
The effect of marketing mix on patient satisfaction
Based on the
results of the research, it is known that the t calculation for the marketing
mix variable is 2.518 at a significance level of 0.006 with a regression
coefficient value (Path Coefficient) of +0.217. Because the path coefficient
value is marked positively, the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value
is 0.006<0.05, it can be concluded that the marketing mix variable has a
positive and significant effect on patient satisfaction. Thus, the H2
hypothesis "There is a positive and significant influence between
marketing mix on patient satisfaction at Hermina Serpong Hospital" is
supported. This means that the better the marketing mix will have an impact on
high patient satisfaction
The results of
this study showed that to increase patient satisfaction, it is necessary to
increase the marketing mix by increasing the 7P (Product, Price, Promotion,
Place, People, Process, and Physical Evidence). Efforts are made to increase
the marketing mix; namely, the Hospital complies with the use of the hospital
management information system (SIMRS) and reviews the Standard Operating
Procedures (SOP) for outpatient services in which quality indicators related to
outpatient waiting times are set. Making
the indicator of response time and service waiting time as indicators of
service quality. Re-socialize service procedures with quality indicators of
outpatient waiting time to all officers so that health workers can provide
maximum service to patients
According to Zeithaml
and Bitner
The effect of patient
satisfaction on the decision to choose a place of delivery
The results of
the study showed that the t calculation for the Patient Satisfaction variable
was 2.415 at a significance level of 0.008 with a regression coefficient value
(Path Coefficient) of +0.322. Because the path coefficient value is marked
positively, the t-value statistically >1.645, and the p-value is
0.008<0.05, it can be concluded that the Patient Satisfaction variable has a
positive and significant effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital.
Thus, the H3 hypothesis "There is a positive and significant influence
between patient satisfaction and the patient's decision to choose a
hospital" is supported.
From the
results of this study, it was found that to improve the decision to choose a
place of delivery, it is necessary to increase satisfaction. In an effort to
increase patient satisfaction, it is necessary to increase the ease of
information and appointments for patients with 24-hour online services and
excellent service.
The results of
this study confirm the theory of Ware et al.
The results of
this study are supported by the research of Siti Lubis (2017), stating that
purchasing decisions have a positive influence on consumer satisfaction. Pighin
et al
The effect of service
quality on the decision to choose a place of delivery
The results
showed that the t calculation for the service quality variable was 3.217 at a
significance level of 0.001 with a regression coefficient value (Path
Coefficient) of +0.354. Because the path coefficient value is marked positively
the t-value statistically >1.645 and p-value 0.001<0.05, it can be
concluded that the service quality variable has a positive and significant
effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital. Thus, the H4 hypothesis
"There is a positive and significant influence between service quality and
patients' decisions in choosing hospitals" is supported. This means that
the better the patient's assessment of the quality of the service received, the
more positive it will have on the patient's decision to choose a hospital
The results of
this study were obtained that to improve the decision to choose a place of
delivery, it is necessary to improve the quality of plea services by increasing
the class of pregnant and maternity women so that patients know the benefits
and advantages, especially from the aspects of safety, convenience, and comfort
during the delivery process, the hospital improves communication and services
to patients such as making 24-hour online consultations, contacting patients to
re-control according to schedule, asking for opinions and patient input to get
service feedback after pregnancy control, the hospital carries out a "pick
up the ball" service strategy for mothers who are close to the estimated
delivery so as to increase access to services at health facilities. The
hospital creates programs and packages of childbirth services that are
attractive to patients, such as providing services for making birth
certificates, Family Cards, and Child Identity Cards in collaboration with the
Population and Civil Registration Office.
The results of
this study are supported by research conducted by Park et al (2021), a study
conducted on 540 clinic patients in South Korea. The results of the study show
that service quality has a significant effect on patient satisfaction and
revisit intention. Siripipatthanakul (2021), a study on 352 clinic patients in
Thailand, the results of the study showed that service quality (Tangibles,
Reliability, and Empathy) had a positive and significant effect on patients'
decisions to reuse health services. Siti Araini Lubis (2017) shows that the
existence of quality service will encourage consumer purchase decisions. In
addition, quality service can also encourage consumers to establish a strong
bond with the company
The influence of marketing
mix on the decision to choose a place of delivery
The results of
the study show that the t calculation for the marketing mix variable is 1.894
at a significance level of 0.029 with a regression coefficient value (Path
Coefficient) of +0.216. Because the path coefficient value is marked positively,
the t-value statistic is >1.645, and the p-value is 0.029 <0.05, it can
be concluded that the marketing mix variable has a positive and significant
effect on the patient's decision to choose a hospital. Thus, the H5 hypothesis
"There is a positive and significant influence between marketing mix on
patients' decisions in choosing hospitals" is supported.
The results of
this study were obtained that to improve the decision to choose a place of
delivery, it is necessary to increase the marketing mix by increasing
compliance with the use of the hospital management information system (SIMRS), review
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for outpatient services in which quality
indicators related to outpatient waiting times are set. This is in accordance with the theory of
consumer behavior of
The influence between
service quality, marketing mix and patient satisfaction has a positive effect
on the decision to choose a delivery place at Hermina Serpong Hospital
Based on the
results of the analysis of the role of patient satisfaction as a mediation or
intervening variable, it is known that the patient satisfaction variable has a
significant effect on the relationship between service quality and patient
literacy. The VAF value is 0.701 or 70.1% because the VAF value is> 20%, so
it can be concluded that patient satisfaction is a mediating variable. Thus,
the H6a hypothesis, "There is a positive and significant influence between
service quality and the patient's decision to choose a hospital through patient
intelligence," is supported. Patient
satisfaction has a significant effect on the relationship between marketing mix
and patient literacy. The VAF value is 0.729 or 72.9% because the VAF value is>
20%, so it can be concluded that patient satisfaction is a mediating variable.
Thus, the H6b hypothesis "There is a positive and significant influence
between marketing mix on patient decisions in choosing hospitals through
patient satisfaction" is supported.
The results of
this study are supported by several previous studies, namely Pighin et al
CONCLUSION
Based on an
analysis conducted on 190 samples of patients at Hermina Serpong Hospital. The
study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the influence of service quality
and marketing mix on the decision to choose a place of delivery at Hermina
Serpong Hospital, with satisfaction as an intervening variable. the conclusions
that can be stated in this study are as follows: The quality of service affects
patient satisfaction at Hermina Serpong Hospital is supported. To increase
patient satisfaction, it is necessary to improve the quality of service by
improving timely services, providing accurate information, and providing fast
and responsive services. The marketing mix affects patient satisfaction at
Hermina Serpong Hospital, and it is supported. To increase patient
satisfaction, it is necessary to increase the marketing mix by increasing
compliance with the use of the hospital management information system (SIMRS),
improving services on time and according to schedule, and creating online
consultation services for patients. Patient satisfaction affects the patient's
decision to choose a hospital at Hermina Serpong Hospital. To improve patient
decisions in choosing a hospital, it is necessary to increase patient
satisfaction with easy access to information and appointments for patients. The
quality of service affects the patient's decision to choose a hospital at
Hermina Serpong Hospital. To improve patients' decisions in choosing a
hospital, it is necessary to improve the quality of service with a pick-up
service and a program to make baby identity cards. Marketing mix affects
patients' decisions when choosing a hospital at Hermina Serpong Hospital. To
improve patients' decisions in choosing hospitals, it is necessary to increase
the marketing mix by increasing the classes of pregnant and maternity women and
expanding information on service flows and hospital facilities for the
community. Service quality, marketing mix, and patient satisfaction affect the
patient's decision to choose a hospital at Hermina Serpong Hospital. To improve
patient decisions when choosing a hospital, it is necessary to improve the
quality of service, marketing mix, and patient satisfaction.
REFERENCE
Agustina, R., & Handayani, S. (2023). HHC RSPP patient
satisfaction and the impact of reliability, assurance, tangible, empathy, and
responsiveness. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2),
799–810.
Al Hammadi, H. M. H. M. (2019). Waiting Time And Patients’satisfaction.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.
M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European
Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Hossain, M. S., Yahya, S. B., & Khan, M. J. (2020). The
effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) health-care services on
patients’ satisfaction and loyalty–a case of Bangladesh. Social
Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 145–158.
Ilekis, J. V., Tsilou, E., Fisher, S., Abrahams, V. M.,
Soares, M. J., Cross, J. C., Zamudio, S., Illsley, N. P., Myatt, L., Colvis,
C., Costantine, M. M., Haas, D. M., Sadovsky, Y., Weiner, C., Rytting, E.,
& Bidwell, G. (2016). Placental origins of adverse pregnancy outcomes:
potential molecular targets: an Executive Workshop Summary of the Eunice
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215(1), S1–S46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.001
Ismail, A., & Yunan, Y. M. (2016). Service quality as a
predictor of customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. LogForum, 12(4),
269–283.
Karsana, W., & Murhadi, W. R. (2021). Effect of service
quality and patient satisfaction on behavioral intention. Journal of
Entrepreneurship and Business, 2(1), 25–36.
Kijima, T., Matsushita, A., Akai, K., Hamano, T., Takahashi,
S., Fujiwara, K., Fujiwara, Y., Sato, M., Nabika, T., & Sundquist, K.
(2021). Patient satisfaction and loyalty in Japanese primary care: a
cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 1–12.
Kotler, P., & Amstrong, G. (2018). Principles of
Marketing. Edisi 15 Global Edition. Pearson.
Meesala, A., & Paul, J. (2018). Service quality,
consumer satisfaction and loyalty in hospitals: Thinking for the future. Journal
of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 261–269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.011
Nasution, N. R., Girsang, E., Ginting, R., & Silean, M.
(2020). The effect of marketing mix on patient
satisfaction in Prima Vision Medan Special Hospital in 2019. International
Journal of Research and Review, 7(8), 241–249.
Norris, J. R., & Walker, J. J. (2020). Solar and sensor
geometry, not vegetation response, drive satellite NDVI phenology in
widespread ecosystems of the western United States. Remote Sensing of
Environment, 249, 112013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112013
Nurfitriani, N., Paradilla, M., & Jariyah, A. (2022).
Patient Satisfaction Service Experience Influence at Pertiwi Special Hospital
for Mothers and Children, South Sulawesi. Journal of Asian Multicultural
Research for Medical and Health Science Study, 3(1), 76–82.
Oosterhuis, H. (2014). Treatment as punishment: Forensic
psychiatry in The Netherlands (1870–2005). International Journal of Law and
Psychiatry, 37(1), 37–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.10.004
Park, S.-J., Yi, Y., & Lee, Y.-R. (2023). Assessment of
six alternative models of service quality. Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence, 34(3–4), 364–396.
Pighin, M., Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S.,
Rojas-Osorio, M., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). Factors of the Revisit Intention
of Patients in the Primary Health Care System in Argentina. Sustainability,
14(20), 13021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013021
Singh, D., & Dixit, K. (2020). Measuring perceived
service quality in healthcare setting in developing countries: A review for
enhancing managerial decision-making. Journal of Health Management, 22(3),
472–489.
Tarihoran, U., Girsang, E., Nasution, S. L. R., &
Ginting, C. (2021). Marketing mix 7P application to increase patient
re-visits. Science and Technology Publications, 73–79.
Uzir, M. U. H., Al Halbusi, H., Lim, R., Jerin, I., Abdul
Hamid, A. B., Ramayah, T., & Haque, A. (2021). Applied Artificial
Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in
Bangladesh during COVID-19. Technology in Society, 67, 101780.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101780
van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2018).
Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study
on coopetition in healthcare. European Management Journal, 36(1),
135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.012
Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2021). Health
care information systems: a practical approach for health care management.
John Wiley & Sons.
Wangsa, I. H. S., Sulastri, S., & Arini, D. P. (2023). It
Goes Beyond Product-Business Innovativeness and Consumer’s New Values Adoption.
Ware, J. E. (2021). Measuring functioning, well-being, and
other generic health concepts. In Effect of cancer on quality of life
(pp. 7–23). CRC Press.
Waters, S., Edmondston, S. J., Yates, P. J., &
Gucciardi, D. F. (2016). Identification of factors influencing patient
satisfaction with orthopaedic outpatient clinic consultation: A qualitative
study. Manual Therapy, 25, 48–55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2016.05.334
©
2024 by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication
under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA)
license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |