A Review of Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Yoga in Controlling
Seizures in Patients with Epilepsy
Setia Rizqiani Subeno1, Anugrah
Alifio2, Alifinda Berliana Putri Hardanti3,
Dhyani Paramita Wahyudi4, Hosianna Stephany Aritonang5 ,
Malya Citra Maharani6, Feda Anisah Makkiyah7
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional
“Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
2110211012@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id1
|
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
|
Epilepsy,
yoga, seizure
frequency, quality of life, adult, children |
Yoga,
one of the non-pharmacological therapies for epilepsy, has been believed
to be an adjunctive therapy to reduce seizure frequency and duration in
adults with epilepsy. The latest
review of some studies on that subject was published earlier in 2017, but this reviewed the old
studies that were published more than ten years ago. So, it is necessary to
update the review to find out how effective yoga is in controlling seizures for
epilepsy. This review is made to evaluate the
effectiveness of yoga in controlling seizures in adult and children with epilepsy We performed two randomized controlled trial
studies selected from PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus, according to eligibility criteria through PRISMA Flowchart steps. In the intervention group, yoga
shows effects that could reduce the frequency and duration of seizures
compared to the control group with sham yoga treatment or without any
additional treatment. Unfortunately,
the detailed characteristics of the participants and the
intervention (frequency and duration of yoga) in each study are heterogeneous. A multicentre
and well-randomized study that recruits a sufficient number of patients, uses
appropriate research methods, and defines explicit inclusion and exclusion
criteria is proposed to be conducted. It also will be essential to help reinforce the evidence of
yoga's effectiveness as adjunctive therapy in
controlling or
reducing the frequency and duration of seizures in epilepsy. |
|
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v3i2.166 |
|
Corresponding Author: Setia Rizqiani Subeno
Email: 2110211012@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id
INTRODUCTION
One of the most common neurological
diseases, epilepsy, affects people of all ages, races, social classes, and
geographical locations (Beghi, 2020).
The brain condition known as epilepsy is defined by an enduring predisposition
to generate seizures and by the neurobiologic,
cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of seizure recurrences (Mirawati et al., 2023).
The prevalence of epilepsy differs significantly among countries depending on
the local distribution of risk and etiologic factors, the number of seizures at
diagnosis, and consideration of whether only active epilepsy (active
prevalence) or also cases in remission are included in the lifetime prevalence (Beghi, 2020). The incidence of epilepsy was higher in
low/middle-income countries (LMIC) than in high-income countries (HIC), which
was explained by the different structure of populations at risk and a greater
exposure to perinatal risk factors, higher rates of central nervous system
infections, and traumatic brain injury in LMIC. The incidence of epilepsy was
also higher in the lowest socioeconomic classes in HIC (Beghi & Hesdorffer, 2014).
Based on age group, the incidence of epilepsy was higher in the youngest and
oldest age-groups (Fiest et al., 2017), with peaks at ages 5–9 years and at
older than 80 years (“Global, Regional, and National Burden
of Epilepsy, 1990–2016,” 2019).
The prevalence of epilepsy was slightly higher in studies of persons over the
age of 18 compared to those under 18 (Fiest et al., 2017).
Epilepsy is typically treated with
pharmacological treatment in the form of medicines. This is frequently regarded
as the primary epilepsy treatment option. Drugs like valproic
acid and carbamazepine are frequently utilized in epileptic situations. By
blocking or modulating sodium channels and inhibiting voltage-gated sodium
channels, these two medications can lower the incidence of recurrent epilepsy
episodes by reducing neuronal excitability. However, in addition to their effects
on epilepsy, these pharmacological therapies can cause side effects like
nausea, vomiting, dizziness, or even worse, an exacerbation of heart failure
when using carbamazepine, or neurological side effects like encephalopathy and
coma when using valproic acid (Maan et al., 2024).
Because of the intensity and number of adverse effects associated with current
pharmacological epilepsy treatment, non-pharmacological therapy may be an
add-on to pharmacological treatment, which has fewer side effects than
pharmaceutical therapy, to help control seizures as the main focus.
There are many non-pharmacological
therapies for epilepsy that have been applied. Behavior interventions (psychobehavioral modalities, yoga and meditation, EEG
biofeedback, and music therapy), neuromodulation
therapies (vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation therapy (RNS), and transcranial
magnetic stimulation therapy (TMS)), and metabolic therapies (ketogenic diet and anaplerotic
diet) have shown significant seizure reduction, improvement in multiple quality
of life, and cognitive domain (Alqahtani et al., 2020; Haut et al.,
2019). Those therapies were
used as adjunctive or complementary therapy for epilepsy. It is essential to develop,
assess, and implement those complementary therapies for epileptic patients as
part of their everyday medical treatment of epilepsy. However, the previously
mentioned non-pharmacological treatments are unable to fully resolve the
patient's epilepsy problem in a way that is comfortable for them. There are
some drawbacks, such as in cases where patients have reflex epilepsy, which can
cause seizures when exposed to certain stimuli such as sudden loudness, sudden
light, and sudden contractions (Okudan & Özkara, 2018).
Despite the shortcomings of those non-pharmacological
therapies mentioned earlier, yoga, an ancient traditional Indian psychophilosophical–cultural method as a mind-body practice
consisting of positive behavioral modification (yamas
and niyamas), physical posture practice (asanas), breath regulation (pranayama),
sensation control (pratyahara), and meditative
practices (dharana dhyana
and samadhi) (Kulal et al., 2021; Patwardhan, 2017),
has many superiorities, such as it can be a home-based practice that is easily
performed (Wadhen & Cartwright, 2021).
Specifically in epilepsy, the potential of yoga as a complementary alternative
therapy uniting body, mind, soul, and spirit (Perkins, 2020)
has been unveiled since it can lower stress, improve quality of life, reduce
psychiatric difficulties, decrease seizure frequency by stimulating the vagus nerve, increase central inhibitory Gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, alter blood flow of the
central nervous system, and lead to a shift in autonomic balance toward
relative parasympathetic dominance (Farnia et al., 2021; Kanhere et al.,
2018; Kulal et al., 2021).
Epilepsy has neurological, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences
that affect the quality of life well beyond the occurrence of seizures in
people with epilepsy. Living with epilepsy faces stigma, common public
misunderstanding, lack of social support, social isolation, embarrassment,
fear, and discrimination (Strzelczyk et al., 2023).
It is estimated that approximately 50% of people with epilepsy present with at
least one comorbidity, which include cognitive, psychiatric, and physical disorders
(Keezer et al., 2016).
The significant impact of yoga in reducing seizure frequency greatly influences
a person's quality of life, as seizure frequency is one of several factors,
including seizure severity, stigmatization, and cognitive impairment, that
affect the quality of life in patients with epilepsy, making it a crucial
concern (Gosain & Samanta, 2022; Singh &
Pandey, 2017).
Frequent seizures can lead to various physical, psychological, and social
complications (Prathikanti et al., 2017).
Review of the yoga’s effectiveness on
seizure (frequency and duration) reduction in patients with epilepsy had been
done and was last published in 2017 (Panebianco et al., 2017).
This review performed two old studies that had been conducted more than 10
years ago and the two were subjected to adult groups. It stated that the number
of participants experiencing a decrease in the frequency and duration of
seizures, even seizure-free, more in the group of participants who received
yoga intervention than in the control group (sham yoga and no treatment).
The update
review performing the new studies is needed to record and see the progress or
any differences in the result about investigation of post-yoga’s effect on the
frequency and duration of seizures in epilepsy. Therefore, this review aims to
evaluate the effectiveness of yoga in controlling seizures in epilepsy. This
review presents recent studies with different types of age groups to see the effects of yoga in
different age groups as well considering the incidence of epilepsy described by
Fiest et al., 2017 was higher in the youngest and oldest age-groups.
METHOD
Searching method
In this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the
effectiveness of yoga in improving the quality of life in adults with epilepsy
was investigated. The electronic databases of Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus
libraries were systematically searched for studies through 1st December 2023
using the core search terms "Yoga" AND "Epilepsy". Manual
searches reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to select any
additional eligible studies.
Selection of studies
The reviewers independently
conducted the literature search and study selection. The participants,
intervention, control, outcome, and study design (PICOS) determined the
selection process. The inclusion criteria for a study are: (1) The study was
conducted or published in the period 2014-2024 (2) Patients diagnosed with
epilepsy (adults and children); (3) Age group of 8 to 60 years; (4) all types
of epilepsy; (5) RCT study. There are also exclusion criteria for the study:
(1) ongoing studies; (2) Pilot study; (3) Other design studies besides RCT
study; (4) Patients who were unwilling to provide consent or practice yoga; (5)
Patients who have practiced yoga/meditation before enrolment; (6) Patients with
an ongoing progressive illness, mental dysfunction, and any disability
preventing active cooperation in study; (7) Patients who were presented with
psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) alone; (8)
Children with more than 10 seizures in 3 months.
Data extraction and outcome measures
Abstracted data and study quality were evaluated by two reviewers using
a standardized extraction form. The reviewers resolved discrepancies by
discussing and involving an additional author who referred to the original
article until all the reviewers reached a consensus. The abstracted items
included the author’s name, published year, country’s originated, design study, participants (who are based on age group, gender, and inclusion criteria), treatment
(intervention, period and duration of
intervention, follow-up time), Comparison/control (sham yoga and without
any treatment), Outcome (based on Seizure
frequency at 3 and 6
months follow-up), the measure of effect (number and
percentage of seizure frequency), and the result. Reviewers tried
to evaluate the quality of the included studies using the guidelines of the
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Assessment of bias risks and methodological quality of included studies
Reviewers assessed the risk of bias and methodological quality of the
included studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. This
tool evaluates vital domains such as Random sequence generation, allocation
concealment, blinding of participants and staff, blinding of the
assessment of results, incomplete result data, and selective result reports. To
ensure accuracy and consistency in the results of each trial, the two reviewers
will work collaboratively and come to a consensus. In the event of any possible
inconsistencies, they will be addressed through open discussion or by seeking
the evaluation of a third reviewer.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart of systematic review selection
We have found five studies in the last ten years
that investigate or discuss the effects of yoga on patients with epilepsy.
However, three out of the five studies need to be excluded from this review
article because one study is the study protocol (Aktar et al., 2023), one study is a qualitative study of Palestinians using interviews (Shawahna & Abdelhaq,
2020), and another one is still
ongoing (Krull, 2020).
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
|
Author, Year |
Design Study |
Participant |
Treatment |
|||||
|
Inclusion Criteria |
Sample Size, N (Male/Female) |
Age (Years) |
Intervention |
Duration |
Follow up |
Control |
||
|
Kaur, et
al., 2023 |
RCT |
Adults
with epilepsy who scored ≥4 on the Kilifi
Stigma Scale (KSS). |
160,
65 (104/56); intervention group (n = 80), control group (n = 80) |
18-60 |
Yoga
and psycho-education (3 months) |
Group: 7
supervised group sessions, lasting
about 45–60 minutes over 12 weeks (3
months). Individual: 30
minutes, at least five times a week at home. |
We
assessed at baseline, three months, and six months. |
Sham yoga and psycho-education |
|
Kanhere, et al., 2018 |
RCT |
Children with an established diagnosis of epilepsy, based on the International
League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition, take AEDs regularly. |
20 (15/5); intervention group (n=10), control group (n=10) |
8-12 |
Yoga (2 months and booster at the end of the fourth
and fifth month) |
Ten sessions, 1 hour each. Once a week over eight weeks (2 months),
followed by two booster sessions at the end of the fourth
and fifth month |
Assessed
at baseline, three months, and six months |
Without any treatment |
Abbreviations: RCT =
Randomized Controlled Trial; AED = Anti-Epileptic Drugs.
Two studies
above assessed the effects of yoga on patients with epilepsy in different
respondent characteristics, one on adult patients and another one on children.
Those studies were conducted in India, which is the same country. The
participants were randomized into intervention and control groups using a
computer-generated randomization technique. Kaur et al., 2023 created a computer-generated
randomization list using the block permutation method stratified by seizure
frequency. Then, sealed
envelopes containing randomization codes were prepared by an independent
researcher who was not affiliated with the study. Kanhere et al., 2018 conducted randomization using computerized
randomization tables. A detailed seizure history, along with background data,
was also documented.

Figure 2 Graph of the
risk of bias analysis performed as percentages
across all the
included studies

Figure
3 Summary of the
risk of bias analysis for each included study
The quality of each included study has been assessed
by Cochrane’s RoB 2, and the results are performed in Figure 2 and
Figure 3. The reason for the unclear risk of bias assessment on blinding of
outcome assessment domain of Kanhere et al., 2018 is that there needs to be an
explanation for the concealment of the assessor when assessing the outcome of
the study. This is different from the high risk of incomplete outcome data
domain in Kaur et al., 2023 because 25 out of 160 participants needed to follow
the study completely, or it could be said that they were lost to follow-up.
We give the low risk in the
blinding of participants domain in both studies even though they did not blind
the participants in their study. The reason is that blinding in each study was
difficult and not possible. The participants will surely know and feel the
intervention given to them. However, blinding was applied in the allocation of
participants into the research group.
Table 2 Seizure outcome
summary of the included studies
|
Author, Year |
Outcome |
Result |
|
Kaur, et al., 2023 |
Number of participants
who have >50% seizure reduction and complete seizure remission |
The
proportion of
patients who had >50% or 100%
(complete seizure freedom) seizure reduction in the
3-month and 6-month follow-up was more significant in the yoga group than in the control group. |
|
Kanhere, et al., 2018 |
Number of children with seizures at 3rd and
sixth month |
In the yoga group, no children had seizures at
the end of 3 and 6 months. Whereas there were four and three children who had
seizures at the end of 3 and 6 months, respectively, in the control group. |
All types of seizure are reported in the included
studies. Absence seizure is excluded in Kanhere, et
al., 2018 study. Both studies showed that yoga as complementary treatment is
able to reduce seizure frequency and duration in patients with epilepsy.
Nevertheless, the result was unsignificant
statistically. It happened due to the high variability in seizure frequency per
week at baseline (Kaur
et al., 2023) and the
patient’s effect of taking AEDs (Anti-Epileptic Drugs) (Kanhere
et al., 2018). The outcome measurement used in Kaur, et al., 2023 was almost the same as the outcome
measurement used for analyzing the study’s result in a Cochrane Review that
consisted of the number of participants who had more than 50% reduction in
seizure frequency and seizure-free status and the number of seizures per month
to see the reduction in seizure frequency (Panebianco
et al., 2017). The
measure of more than 50% seizure reduction has been mandated bu the European Medicines Agency for regulatory approval of
novel pharmaceuticals for epilepsy (Kaur
et al., 2023).
Protocols
of Yoga
Yoga intervention should be conducted by a qualified physiotherapist who
is a certified yoga instructor. Yoga instructions are given to the patients and
their caregivers in the vernacular (Hindi) or English in an easy-to-understand
manner (Kaur
et al., 2023). The participants should have
sufficient motivation and time to learn yoga and practice it daily according to
the protocol.
The protocol of yoga as an intervention applied in each previous study
differs. The components in sham yoga used by Kaur et
al., 2023 include relaxation or loosening practice (Sukshma
Vyayama), meditation, and positive affirmations
or suggestions. The protocol included exercises that imitated the yoga poses
described earlier, but the participants did not receive guidance on two
essential aspects of yoga: (1) deliberate and coordinated breathing and (2)
focus on body movements and sensations during the session. Without these two
elements, the imitation intervention was expected to have a metabolic profile
similar to that of yoga, yet lacked its fundamental elements that are believed
to trigger a relaxation response. The step-by-step intervention protocol used
for a patient in the sham group is Sukshma Vyayama (5 minutes, 5 rounds each) - Loosening of fingers,
wrists, elbow, shoulder rotation, neck bending, toe bending without speed
regulation, focus, and breathe. Breathing normally in a relaxed position for 10
minutes, and finally lying down in a relaxed position
for 15 minutes.
On the other hand, Kanhere, et al., 2018 used
a standard 10 hours yoga protocol that was designed by yoga experts and yoga
teachers. The point is they applied the same yoga techniques, like controlled
deep breathing patterns (Pranayama), relaxation or loosening practice (Sukshma Vyayama),
meditation, and positive affirmations or suggestions. There are also other
techniques of yoga that are applied in Kanhere, et
al., 2018 such as specific physical posture control (Asanas),
body balance and neuromuscular coordinating exercises, and games of body–mind
coordination. Participants in a qualitative study from Palestine also use
breathing, physical strengthening exercises, meditation, prayers, and
spirituality (Shawahna
& Abdelhaq, 2020).
There are different intervention characteristics based on frequency and
duration of intervention. Besides the differences of such criteria that have
been mentioned in the included studies (see Table 1), the study protocol
states that each yoga session will last approximately 45-60 minutes three times
per week for 8 weeks, the detailed instructions regarding the yoga session and
procedures will be given by yoga instructor in the first session (Aktar
et al., 2023). In addition, there is a
qualitative study of Palestinians whose participants had been practicing yoga
for years, ranging from less than 3 years to more than 5 years (Shawahna
& Abdelhaq, 2020). Half of
the participants practiced yoga in less than 30 minutes, and the rest were over
30 minutes. Most participants had one to three sessions of yoga per week. Based
on the result of this study, one of the perceived benefits of yoga is
improvements in the management of seizures.
Study
Limitations
This review may still be insufficient to be generalized because the
number of included studies according to the eligibility criteria is very
limited. Moreover, the number of studies that investigate the yoga’s effect on
epilepsy is limited too, especially in pediatric patients. There are some heterogeneities
in the included study; such as the age group criteria and characteristics of
the intervention (such as procedure, frequency, and duration of yoga).
Therefore, a meta-analysis of the evidence base is impossible to be conducted.
CONCLUSION
The
studies reported that yoga can reduce the frequency and duration
of seizures in patients with epilepsy, both in children and adults.
Furthermore, there were no reports of adverse effects of yoga as observed in
the studies. Yoga
has a good effect on body physiology, psychology, and the autonomic
system. These effects apply to patients with epilepsy who are either taking AEDs
regularly or getting drug refractory. A professional yoga therapist is needed to
help practitioners practice yoga in order to reach optimal results. However,
this review has not yet drawn a full and mature conclusion regarding the effectiveness of yoga as an additional
treatment for epilepsy in adults and children because of the shortcomings of this review that has been explained at study
limitations section. A multicenter, cross-cultural, well-randomized controlled
study is proposed to be conducted. It may be done by recruiting a sufficient number of
patients, using appropriate research methods, and defining explicit inclusion
and exclusion criteria. Thus, it is expected to help reinforce
the evidence of yoga's effect in controlling seizures of
epilepsy and will probably be highly recommended as an additional therapy in epilepsy in
the future.
REFERENCES
Aktar, B., Balci,
B., Eraslan Boz, H., Oztura, I., & Baklan, B. (2023). Yoga and aerobic
exercise in epilepsy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy
Research International: The Journal for Researchers and Clinicians in Physical
Therapy, 28(4), e2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2013
Alqahtani, F., Imran, I., Pervaiz, H., Ashraf, W., Perveen, N., Rasool,
M. F., Alasmari, A. F., Alharbi, M., Samad, N., Alqarni, S. A., Al-Rejaie, S.
S., & Alanazi, M. M. (2020). Non-pharmacological Interventions for
Intractable Epilepsy. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ, 28(8),
951–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.06.016
Beghi, E. (2020). The Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology,
54(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503831
Beghi, E., & Hesdorffer, D. (2014). Prevalence of epilepsy—An
unknown quantity. Epilepsia, 55(7), 963–967.
https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12579
Farnia, V., Afshari, D., Abdoli, N., Radmehr, F., Moradinazar, M.,
Alikhani, M., Behrouz, B., Khodamoradi, M., & Farhadian, N. (2021). The
effect of substance abuse on depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21) in
epileptic patients. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 9,
128–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.08.001
Fiest, K. M., Sauro, K. M., Wiebe, S., Patten, S. B., Kwon, C.-S.,
Dykeman, J., Pringsheim, T., Lorenzetti, D. L., & Jetté, N. (2017).
Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy. Neurology, 88(3), 296–303.
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003509
Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: A
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. (2019). The
Lancet. Neurology, 18(4), 357–375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30454-X
Gosain, K., & Samanta, T. (2022). Understanding the Role of Stigma
and Misconceptions in the Experience of Epilepsy in India: Findings From a
Mixed-Methods Study. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 790145.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.790145
Haut, S. R., Gursky, J. M., & Privitera, M. (2019). Behavioral
interventions in epilepsy. Current Opinion in Neurology, 32(2),
227–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000661
Kanhere, S., Bagadia, D., Phadke, V., & Mukherjee, P. (2018). Yoga
in children with epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Pediatric Neurosciences, 13(4), 410.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JPN.JPN_88_18
Kaur, K., Sharma, G., Dwivedi, R., Nehra, A., Parajuli, N., Upadhyay,
A. D., Deepak, K. K., Jat, M. S., Ramanujam, B., Sagar, R., Mohanty, S., &
Tripathi, M. (2023). Effectiveness of Yoga Intervention in Reducing Felt Stigma
in Adults With Epilepsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurology, 101(23).
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207944
Keezer, M. R., Sisodiya, S. M., & Sander, J. W. (2016).
Comorbidities of epilepsy: Current concepts and future perspectives. The
Lancet. Neurology, 15(1), 106–115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00225-2
Krull, S. (2020). The impact
of Ashtanga yoga on reducing seizures and increasing quality of life among
individuals with intractable epilepsy. https://doi.org/10.58809/XPBT1774
Kulal, J., Rashmitha, A. P., & Kumar, K. U. D. (2021). Effect of
Yoga in Stress Management in Patients with Epilepsy- A Literature Review. Journal
of Pharmaceutical Research International, 41–48.
https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i62B35169
Maan, J. S., Duong, T. vi H., & Saadabadi, A. (2024).
Carbamazepine. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482455/
Mirawati, diah kurnia,
Handayani, L., Subandi, S., Hafizhan, M., & Putra, S. (2023).
Quality of Life in Epilepsy: Comparison between Indonesian Version of QOLIE-10
and QOLIE-31. International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS), 12, 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v12i3.23043
Okudan, Z. V., & Özkara, Ç. (2018). Reflex epilepsy: Triggers and
management strategies. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14,
327–337. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S107669
Panebianco, M., Sridharan, K., & Ramaratnam, S. (2017). Yoga for
epilepsy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(10),
CD001524. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001524.pub3
Patwardhan, A. R. (2017). Yoga Research and Public Health: Is Research
Aligned With The Stakeholders’ Needs? Journal of Primary Care &
Community Health, 8(1), 31–36.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916664682
Perkins, A. (2020). Yoga for patient health: Uniting body, mind, and
spirit. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 18(4), 6–9.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NME.0000668380.69596.f1
Prathikanti, S., Rivera, R., Cochran, A., Tungol, J. G., Fayazmanesh,
N., & Weinmann, E. (2017). Treating major depression with yoga: A
prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial. PloS One, 12(3),
e0173869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173869
Shawahna, R., & Abdelhaq, I. (2020). Exploring perceived benefits,
motives, barriers, and recommendations for prescribing yoga exercises as a
nonpharmacological intervention for patients with epilepsy: A qualitative study
from Palestine. Epilepsy & Behavior, 106, 107041.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107041
Singh, P., & Pandey, A. K. (2017). Quality of life in epilepsy. International
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(2).
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20170024
Strzelczyk, A., Aledo-Serrano, A., Coppola, A., Didelot, A., Bates, E.,
Sainz-Fuertes, R., & Lawthom, C. (2023). The impact of epilepsy on quality
of life: Findings from a European survey. Epilepsy & Behavior: E&B,
142, 109179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109179
Wadhen, V., & Cartwright, T. (2021). Feasibility and outcome of an
online streamed yoga intervention on stress and wellbeing of people working
from home during COVID-19. Work, 69(2), 331–349.
https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205325