THE EFFECT OF RECRUITMENT AND JOB PLACEMENT ON
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PERUMDAM TIRTA DARMA AYU
Sefi Haryati
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
|
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
|
recruitment,
job placement, employee performance. |
Employee
performance is very important for the company because it will affect the achievement
of company targets. There are several factors to improve employee
performance, including recruitment and job placement. This study aims to
determine the effect of recruitment and job placement partially or
simultaneously on the performance of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employees,
Indramayu Regency. This type of research uses quantitative. The population in
this study were 114 employees, so the determination of the sample in this
study used probability sampling with the slovin technique so that a sample of
55 respondents was obtained. Methods in data collection using a
questionnaire, while the analysis technique used to use hypothesis testing.
The results of this study indicate that there is a positive and significant
influence between recruitment on employee performance seen from tcount
> ttable, namely 2.113 > 2.00575, work placement has a
positive and significant effect on employee performance seen from tcount
> ttable, namely 7.831 > 2.00575. Simultaneously the
variables of recruitment and job placement have a positive and significant
effect on employee performance seen from Fcount > Ftable,
namely 59.787 > 3. 18. |
|
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v1i2.13 |
|
Corresponding Author: Sefi Haryati
E-mail: sefie778899@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Human resources
are a significant determinant of the effectiveness of running activities within
the company (Sharif,
2010). The company will continue to
seek and maintain the best quality human resources that can improve the
performance of the company (Larasati,
2018). Especially in the face of
global competition. Employee performance is significant for the company because
it will affect the achievement of company targets (Desi
Kristanti & Pangastuti, 2019). Performance can also be interpreted as individual success in
doing work (Umam,
2018: 186). The measure of the success of
each employee depends on the function of a specific job in the form of activity
during a certain period of time-based on predetermined conditions or agreements
(Owan
et al., 2022). The company indeed expects
good performance from every employee. The level of employee performance can
also be seen from the parties' involvement and matters related to the company. And various
ways can be taken by companies to improve employee performance. To improve
employee performance, there are several factors, including recruitment. The
company carries out recruitment to get the right employees, both in quality and
quantity, to achieve the performance plan agreed upon by the company (Andali, 2013). In addition, other factors
affect employee performance, namely work placement. According to (Ismartaya, 2019:29),
placement is
a process carried out by new employees who will be given jobs according to
their abilities and capabilities. Placements also increase employee morale and
effectiveness and result in higher job satisfaction, which affects employee
performance.
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu Regency, realizes
that employee performance is significant for the company's sustainability in
the future to achieve the goals and targets set by the company. Setting targets
within the company can encourage employee performance to jointly advance the
company. The total number of employees or employees owned by PERUMDAM Tirta
Darma Ayu is 545 people, including branches and units spread across Indramayu
Regency, while the central PERUMDAM itself has 114 employees. The following
table evaluates the performance of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employees, Indramayu
Regency, for 2019-2021, as follows:
Table 1. Performance Assessment Table for PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu Employees, Indramayu
Regency 2019-2021
|
Years |
Division |
Average Employee Performance Rating |
Average totals |
|||||
|
Achievement |
Responsibility |
Discipline |
Honesty |
Cooperation |
||||
|
2019 |
SPI |
76 |
77 |
78 |
75 |
76 |
76.4 |
|
|
R&D |
77 |
75 |
75 |
77 |
77 |
76.2 |
||
|
General |
75 |
76 |
76 |
77 |
75 |
75.8 |
||
|
HR |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
||
|
Finance |
80 |
81 |
80 |
80 |
81 |
80.4 |
||
|
Public Relations &
Secretariat |
80 |
80 |
81 |
80 |
80 |
80.2 |
||
|
Production |
75 |
77 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
||
|
Planning &
Supervision |
76 |
75 |
75 |
78 |
77 |
76.2 |
||
|
SPA Maintenance &
Handling |
75 |
75 |
75 |
76 |
76 |
75.4 |
||
|
2020 |
SPI |
76 |
78 |
78 |
75 |
76 |
76.6 |
|
|
R&D |
77 |
75 |
76 |
77 |
77 |
76.4 |
||
|
General |
75 |
76 |
76 |
77 |
78 |
76.4 |
||
|
HR |
80 |
82 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80.4 |
||
|
Finance |
80 |
81 |
81 |
80 |
81 |
80.6 |
||
|
Public Relations &
Secretariat |
80 |
80 |
81 |
82 |
80 |
80.6 |
||
|
Production |
75 |
77 |
76 |
77 |
76 |
76.2 |
||
|
Planning &
Supervision |
76 |
75 |
76 |
78 |
77 |
76.4 |
||
|
SPA Maintenance &
Handling |
75 |
75 |
75 |
78 |
76 |
75.8 |
||
|
2021 |
SPI |
78 |
78 |
78 |
75 |
76 |
77 |
|
|
R&D |
77 |
76 |
76 |
77 |
77 |
76.6 |
||
|
General |
75 |
76 |
77 |
77 |
78 |
76.6 |
||
|
HR |
82 |
82 |
80 |
81 |
80 |
81 |
||
|
Finance |
80 |
81 |
81 |
81 |
81 |
80.8 |
||
|
Public Relations &
Secretariat |
81 |
80 |
81 |
82 |
80 |
80.8 |
||
|
Production |
75 |
77 |
76 |
77 |
76 |
76.2 |
||
|
Planning &
Supervision |
76 |
75 |
76 |
78 |
77 |
76.4 |
||
|
SPA Maintenance &
Handling |
75 |
75 |
75 |
78 |
76 |
75.8 |
||
Source: PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu Indramayu Regency
2019-2021
To evaluate the
performance of employees at PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, there is a minimum
standard value set by the company with a value of 80 points in the outstanding
category based on reports based on PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employee assessment
reports, Indramayu Regency 2019-2021 year as seen from the table of assessment
reports there are three divisions that have achieved the minimum standard of
good performance evaluation, namely the general, finance, and secretarial
public relations divisions which have achieved an average of 80% and above. At
the same time, other divisions want to achieve a predetermined minimum average
or still below 80 points. Divisions that have not achieved an average score include
R & D, HR, production planning and supervision, and SPA maintenance and
handling.
The
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu company must monitor employee performance development
because it can be seen from table 1 performance appraisal that there is a
tendency to decrease performance in some divisions. The performance and
implementation of company programs, the low level of responsibility for each
employee, the work that cannot be completed on time, and the high level of
customer complaints related to clean water services.
Table 2. Customer Complaints in 2019-2021
|
Year |
Customer Complaints |
|||
|
Quality |
Quantity |
Continuity |
Leakage |
|
|
2019 |
32 |
262 |
328 |
3179 |
|
2020 |
35 |
207 |
355 |
3412 |
|
2021 |
27 |
353 |
582 |
4243 |
Source: PERUMDAM
Tirta Darma Ayu Indramayu Regency 2019-2021
The table above explains
that customer complaints about water quality have increased and decreased in
2019-2021, water quantity has increased and decreased from 2019 to 2021,
continuity has increased every year, and water leakage has increased yearly.
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma ayu is known to experience increased water loss every
year, and this water loss is due to customer pipe leaks. Loss of water in the
reservoir and damage to the customer's water meter. Of course, by doing so, the
company can handle these problems so as not to experience losses and can
provide full service to its customers. Based on the results of interviews based
on the table of customer complaints, the percentage of leakage that has been
served is 99% because every customer complaint of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu will
be handled as soon as possible.
From
the description above, it can be seen how strong employee performance is for
the company to achieve the company's goals that have been set. Therefore,
employee performance can be determined by the abilities possessed by each
employee in carrying out their duties according to their responsibilities.
Recruitment is a series of activities to find and attract job applicants with
the necessary motivation, abilities, skills, and knowledge to cover
deficiencies identified in staffing planning (Sendow
& Mekel, 2015). Based on the results of the
interviews, the withdrawal or recruitment stage at PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu was
not maximized because when recruiting new applicants to enter, PERUMDAM Tirta
Darma Ayu did not have any procedures that should have existed when recruiting
new employees. For example, placing advertisements on social media or
newspapers. However, at PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, the method of recruitment is
by applying based on insiders, be it between employees and relatives or
relatives who wish to enter the company. From the recruitment process, after
that, the company will carry out selection and placement to select employees
who will become employees according to the qualifications that meet the
requirements and according to the company's needs to occupy certain positions
or positions within the company. Whereas in the placement activities at
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu Regency, the placement is still not
suitable, as can be seen from the following table:
Table 3. Placements not according to 2021
|
Educational background |
Placement on the part |
Total (Employee) |
|
S1 Education |
Mechanical & Electrical Staff |
1 |
|
S1 Psychology |
Bookkeeping Staff |
1 |
|
S1 Engineering |
Laboratory Staff |
1 |
|
D3 Midwifery |
Community Media & Customer Service Staff |
1 |
|
S1 Pharmacy |
Production Unit Staff |
1 |
|
TOTAL |
5 |
|
Source: PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu,
Indramayu Regency in 2021
Based on table 3,
the placement of employees is based on their educational level, starting from
D3 to S1. However, it is still miserable that the placement is not appropriate
based on the level of education attained by the employee. Five employees are unsuitable,
causing a gap between the duties and responsibilities. This is based on
Minister of Home Affairs regulation number 2 of 2007 concerning the organs and
staffing of regional drinking water companies in article 33, which states that
the appointment of employees of regional drinking water companies must meet the
requirements, while the third point states that employees have the education,
skills and expertise required (No. ,
2 CE). However, PERUMDAM Tirta Darma
Ayu, Indramayu Regency, is still not following education, skills and expertise.
This
research is in line with research conducted by (Tijow
et al., 2021) "The effect of
recruitment and job placement on the performance of PT Telkom Manado employees"
and (Makassar,
2018) "Effects of Recruitment,
Selection, and Work Placement by PT. Mutualplus Global Resources Makassar on
Employee Performance at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. Regional
Office of Makassar." This study said that recruitment and job placement
simultaneously positively and significantly impact employee performance. Based
on the phenomena in PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu Regency, this
researcher aims to determine the effect
of recruitment and job placement on employee performance at PERUMDAM Tirta
Darma Ayu in Indramayu Regency.
METHODS
This type of research uses quantitative research
because it involves several respondents to test the hypothesis, which will be
tested using statistical tests. Researchers used data processing tools in the
form of SPSS software (Statistical Product and Service Solution) Version 23 for
windows. The population used in this study are all permanent employees of
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu Regency, totaling 114 employees. The
technique for determining the sample to be used in this study is the Simple
Random Sampling technique. Based on the calculation of the slovin formula
above, a sample of 55 employees is obtained. The data collection techniques
used in this research are primary and secondary data. The data analysis used is
instrument analysis, classical assumption test, multiple linear regression
analysis of the coefficient of determination and hypothesis testing.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1. Normality Test
The normality test is carried out with the aim of testing
whether, in the regression model, the dependent variable or both have a normal
distribution or not. A good regression model is a standard or close-to-normal
data distribution (Lawendatu
et al., 2014). The results of the normality
test using the graphical analysis method by looking at the output results of
the Normality Probability Plots using
SPSS Version 23.0 for windows can be
seen in the image below:

Figure
1. PP Plot Normality Test
Source:
SPSS 23.0 output results
Based on Figure 1 above, the data
spread around the diagonal line and follows the direction of the diagonal line,
so the data is usually distributed, and the regression model meets the
normality assumption.
Parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) output results can be seen in the
image below:
Table 4. Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Test Normality Test
|
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test |
||
|
|
Unstandardized Residuals |
|
|
N |
55 |
|
|
Normal Parameters a, b |
Means |
.0000000 |
|
Std. Deviation |
3.66919339 |
|
|
Most Extreme Differences |
absolute |
087 |
|
Positive |
087 |
|
|
Negative |
-.077 |
|
|
Test Statistics |
087 |
|
|
asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
. 200c, d |
|
|
a. Test distribution is Normal. |
||
|
b. Calculated from data. |
||
|
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction. |
||
|
d. This is a lower bound of the true significance. |
||
Source: SPSS
23.0 output results
Based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test table above, Asymp.
Sig (2-tailed) is 0.200 > 0.05, meaning
the data is usually distributed.
2. Multicollinearity Test
Multicollinearity was used to
determine whether the regression model found a correlation between the
independent variables (Kulon
& Barat, 2017) . If there is a correlation, a
multicollinearity problem must be overcome. The provisions that apply in this
test are, if the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) value is > 10 and the
Tolerance value is <0.1, then there is multicollinearity, whereas if VIF is
<10 and the Tolerance value is > 0.1, then there is no multicollinearity.
The multicollinearity test results can be seen in the Coefficient table below:
Table 5. Multicollinearity Test
Results
|
Coefficients a |
|||
|
Model |
Collinearity Statistics |
||
|
tolerance |
VIF |
||
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Recruitment |
.701 |
1,426 |
|
|
Placement_Work |
.701 |
1,426 |
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Employee_Performance |
|||
Source: SPSS 23.0 output results
Based on table 5 above, it can be seen in the Collinearity Statistics column the VIF value for recruitment is
1.426, which means the VIF value is < 10 or 1.426 < 10, and the Tolerance
value is 0.701 which means the Tolerance value is > 0.10 or 0.701 > 0.10.
For
the placement variable, the VIF value is 1.426, which means the VIF value is
< 10 or 1.426 < 10, and the Tolerance value is 0.701, which means the
Tolerance value is > 0.10 or 0.701 > 0.10.
Thus, it can be stated that the model formed does not have any symptoms
of multicollinearity. This means that there are independent variables that
tolerate each other.
3. Multiple Regression Analysis
The following is the calculation result of SPSS Version 23.0
for windows regarding the effect of recruitment and job placement on employee
performance at PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu Regency, which can be seen
in the Coefficient table below:
Table 6.
Results of Multiple Regression Analysis
|
Coefficients a |
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
Q |
Sig. |
||
|
B |
std. Error |
Betas |
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
12,916 |
4,903 |
|
2,634 |
011 |
|
Recruitment |
.200 |
095 |
.193 |
2.113 |
039 |
|
|
Placement_Work |
.835 |
.107 |
.714 |
7,831 |
.000 |
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Employee_Performance |
||||||
Source: SPSS 23.0 output results
Formula
equality linear double
is:
Ῡ = a + 𝒃 𝟏 𝑿 𝟏 + 𝒃 𝟐 𝑿 𝟐
In the coefficient table above, multiple linear equations can be arranged as
follows:
Ῡ= 12.916 + 0.200X1 + 0.835X2
Based on the linear
equation above shows the direction of each independent variable to the
dependent variable, which can be described as follows:
a. A
constant value of 12.916 indicates that if recruitment and job placement are
not carried out, then the level of employee performance is 12.916.
b. The
regression coefficient on the recruitment variable is 0.200, meaning that if
the recruitment is done well, there will be an increase in employee performance
of 0.200.
c. The
regression coefficient on the job placement variable is 0.835, meaning that if
the placement is done well, there will be an increase in employee performance
of 0.835.
4. Coefficient
of Determination
The
coefficient of determination measures how much influence recruitment and work
placement have on employee performance at PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu, Indramayu
Regency. The results of the coefficient of determination can be seen in the
Model Summary table below:
Table
7. Results of the Coefficient of Determination
|
Summary Model b |
||||
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
std. The error in
the Estimate |
|
1 |
.835 a |
.697 |
.685 |
3,739 |
|
a. Predictors:
(Constant), Placement_Work, Recruitment |
||||
|
b. Dependent
Variable: Employee_Performance |
||||
Source: SPSS 23.0 output results
Based on the results of table 7 above,
the value of the coefficient of determination, or can be seen in the Adjusted R
Square, is 0.685, meaning that this number indicates that the magnitude of the
influence of the recruitment variable (X1), work placement (X2) together on
employee performance (Y) is 68 .5%, while the remaining 100% - 68.5% = 31.5% is
influenced by other factors or variables.
5.
Hypothesis testing
a.
T-Test Results in Effect of Recruitment on Employee Performance
Based on table 4.20 above for the recruitment variable, the tcount >
ttable is 2.113 > 2.00575 and a significance value of 0.039
<0.050. This means that HO is rejected and Ha is accepted, where there is a
positive and significant influence between recruitment on employee performance,
the researcher presents a picture to illustrate the location or position of tcount
with ttable, namely as follows:
![]()

![]()
![]()
Figure 2. Acceptance and Rejection of the First Hypothesis
This
study's results align with research conducted (Suryani & Sulaeman, 2021) which
states that recruitment has a significant effect on the performance of PT
employees. Telkom Access West Jakarta. Based on previous research, it can be
said that recruitment has a significant effect on employee performance because
companies need to carry out good recruitment and selection so that the
resulting human resources can become one of the critical success factors in
achieving company goals and producing outstanding employee performance.
b. Results of the T-test The Effect of Work Placement on Employee
Performance
Based on table 4.20 above for
the placement variable, the tcount > ttable is 7.831
> 2.00575 and a significance value of 0.000 <0.050. This means that Ho is
rejected and Ha is accepted, where there is a positive and significant
influence between work placement on employee performance, the researcher
presents a picture to illustrate the location or position of tcount with
ttable, namely as follows:
![]()
![]()
![]()

Figure 3. Areas of Acceptance and Rejection of the Second
Hypothesis
This study's results align with research conducted (Susanto, 2020) which states that work placement has a significant
effect on employee performance at the Food Crops, Horticulture and Plantation
Services of Sarolangun Regency. Based on previous research, it can be said that
job placement has a significant effect on employee performance because HR
placement is placing someone in the correct job position; how well an employee
fits the job will affect the amount and quality of work.
c. The Effect of Recruitment and
Work Placement on Employee Performance
The following are the results of
testing the hypothesis using SPSS Version
23.0 for windows:
Table 8. F Test
Results Effect of Recruitment and Work
Placement on Employee
Performance
|
ANOVA a |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
Df |
MeanSquare |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
1671,726 |
2 |
835,863 |
59,787 |
.000 b |
|
residual |
727,001 |
52 |
13,981 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
2398,727 |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Employee_Performance |
||||||
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), Placement_Work, Recruitment |
||||||
Source: SPSS 23.0 output
results
Based on
table 4.22 above,
the calculated Fcount 59.787
> Ftable 3.18. Thus Ho is rejected, and Ha is accepted. This means
there is a significant and positive influence between recruitment and job
placement on employee performance. This study presents an image to describe the
location or position of Fcount with Ftable, namely as
follows:
![]()
![]()



![]()
![]()
Figure 4. Areas of Acceptance and Rejection of the Hypothesis
The results of this study align with research conducted
(Tijow et al., 2021) which states that recruitment and work placement
simultaneously significantly affect PT employees' performance. TelkomManado.
Based on previous research, it can be said that recruitment and placement of
employees simultaneously have a positive and significant effect on employee
performance, with good company recruitment and placement of human resources
must be seen as a matching process. How well the workforce is matched to the
job will affect the number and performance of employees.
CONCLUSION
Recruitment has a positive and significant effect on the performance of
PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employees, Indramayu Regency, meaning that the better
the recruitment carried out by the company, the better the human resources will
be produced, and can be one of the critical success factors in achieving
company goals because it results in employee performance achievers. This is
proven by the results of the (Partial) T-test analysis, which states that the tcount
bigger than the ttable. The placement has a positive and
significant effect on the performance of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employees,
Indramayu Regency, meaning that the better the work placement carried out by
the company, the better the employee performance will be. This is proven by the
results of the (Partial) T-test analysis, which states that the tcount greater
than the t table. Recruitment and job placement simultaneously have
a positive and significant effect on the performance of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma
Ayu employees, Indramayu Regency, meaning that the better the recruitment and
placement of employees in the company, the two variables will have a good
impact on the performance of PERUMDAM Tirta Darma Ayu employees, Indramayu
Regency. This is proven by the results of the F test analysis (simultaneous),
which states that the Fcount is greater than the Ftable.
REFERENCES
Desi Kristanti, SE, & Pangastuti, RL (2019). Tips
on stimulating the performance of production employees. Media
Friends of Scholars.
Irsan,
M. (2021). Model Analysis of Recruitment Policy, Selection and Job Placement on
Employee Performance at Aviation Security (Avsec) Aviation Security at PT.
Angkasa Pura II Kualanamu. Collection of Scientific Work of Faculty of
Social Science Students, 1 (01).
Ismartaya,
S. and. (2019). Human Resource Management. ALPHABET.
Kamuli,
S. (2013). Employee Planning. Article, 1 (60).
Kulon,
KM, & Barat, KMKMJ (2017). Research methodology .
Larasati,
S. (2018). Human resource management. Deepublish.
Lawendatu,
J., Kekenusa, JS, & Hatidja, D. (2014). Multiple linear regression to
analyze the income of nutmeg farmers. D'CARTESIAN: Journal of Mathematics
And Applications, 3 (1), 66–72.
Makassar,
Kindergarten (2018). Journal of Socio Science. 152–162.
Number,
PMDN (2 CE). of 2007 concerning Organs and Personnel of Regional Drinking
Water Companies. Jakarta.
Owan,
VJ, Odigwe, FN, Okon, AE, Duruamaku-Dim, JU, Yam, IO, Emanghe, EE, Owan, M. V,
& Bassey, BA (2022). Contributions of placement, retraining and motivation
to teachers' job commitment: structural equation modeling of the linkages. Heliyon , 8 (4),
e09334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09334
Sendow,
J., & Mekel, PA (2015). The Influence of Recruitment, Motivation and Job
Training on Employee Performance at PT. PLN (Persero) North Sulawesi Region. EMBA
Journal: Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Accounting Research,
3 (1).
Suryani,
NL, & Sulaeman, A. (2021). The Influence of Employee Recruitment and
Selection on Employee Performance at PT. Telkom Access West Jakarta. Journal
of Business Disruption, 4 (2), 164.
Susanto,
Y. (2020). The Influence of Work Placement, Motivation and Discipline on
Employee Performance at the Department of Food Crops, Horticulture and
Plantation, Sarolangun Regency. Sriwijaya Journal of Management and Business,
18 (3), 133–144.
Sharif,
R. (2010). Human Resource Management. Third Printing. Jakarta: Main Library
Gramedia Publishers.
Tijow,
G., Areros, WA, & Rumawas, W. (2021). The Influence of Recruitment and Work
Placement on Employee Performance at PT. TelkomManado. Productivity, 2
(1), 26–30.
Umam,
K. (2018). Organizational Behavior. Loyal Librarian CV.
|
|
|