PLATELET-RICH PLASMA DRESSING
FOR CHRONIC WOUND RECOVERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Carissa
Sulaiman1, Briliantono M Soenarwo2
Rumah Sakit Khusus Bedah Halimun, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia1
RSUD Ir. Soekarno,
Maluku Utara, Indonesia2
carissasulaiman@gmail.com1, bmunardi@gmail.com2
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
Platelet-Rich Plasma, Minoxidil, RCT |
Chronic
wounds are wounds whose healing phase does not match the physiological phase
of wound healing. Chronic wounds, characterized by wounds that do not undergo
a regular, regular, and timely repair process, remain a significant clinical
challenge for healthcare professionals worldwide. As PRP treatments gain
momentum in clinical settings, this meta-analysis seeks to offer an
evidence-based perspective on their role in chronic wound management, paving
the way for informed clinical practice and future research directions. This
study aimed to systematically identify the effectiveness of platelet-rich
plasma clothing in accelerating chronic wound healing. The studies
predominantly employed Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) to evaluate
treatments for various wound etiologies, including diabetic, venous,
arterial, and mixed. Key outcomes gauged encompassed wound closure rate, size
reduction, and other related parameters. While most studies showcased PRP's
effectiveness, particularly in dressing form, there was a noticeable
heterogeneity among the results. In a side exploration, PRP dressing was
juxtaposed against PRP injection, revealing both methods' merits in wound
management. In conclusion, while PRP treatments, be it in dressing or
injectable form, offer potential benefits for chronic wound healing, the
variability in study outcomes highlights the need for more standardized
research methodologies. |
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v2i11.119 |
|
Corresponding Author: Carissa Sulaiman
Email: carissasulaiman@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Chronic
wounds, characterized as wounds that do not undergo a regular, orderly, and
timely repair process, remain a significant clinical challenge for healthcare
professionals worldwide (Falanga
et al., 2022). These wounds often
persist in the inflammatory phase for extended periods, causing significant
discomfort to patients and placing a substantial economic strain on healthcare
systems (Sen,
2019). With the aging global
population, the prevalence of conditions such as diabetes, venous
insufficiency, and pressure ulcers is increasing, emphasizing the urgency to
find effective wound care solutions (Bowers
& Franco, 2020).
The complexity
of chronic wounds stems from various underlying causes (Goldberg
& Diegelmann, 2020). Beyond the obvious
physical trauma, other factors such as vascular diseases, immune system
imbalance, and metabolic disruptions can all contribute to the chronicity of
these wounds (Goldberg
& Diegelmann, 2020). The cellular and
molecular mechanisms involved in chronic wounds are intricate and multifaceted.
For instance, chronic inflammation, often seen in these wounds, can lead to
excessive production of proteases, which can degrade the essential growth
factors and proteins necessary for wound closure (Raziyeva
et al., 2021).
Furthermore,
the microbial environment of chronic wounds is distinct from that of acute
wounds (Verbanic
et al., 2020). Chronic wounds often
harbor a higher bacterial load and demonstrate increased biofilm formation,
which can impede the healing process (Wu et
al., 2019). Biofilms, complex
communities of microorganisms encased in a protective matrix, can be resistant
to traditional antimicrobial treatments, making them particularly challenging
to manage (Harika
et al., 2020).
The social and
psychological impact of chronic wounds on patients cannot be understated (Klein
et al., 2021). Persistent pain,
malodor, exudate, and the sight of non-healing wounds can lead to anxiety,
depression, and social isolation (Gupta
et al., 2021). This, in turn, can
negatively influence a patient's adherence to treatment and overall quality of
life (A. C.
de Oliveira et al., 2019).
In this
landscape, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) treatments have emerged as a potential
method to expedite the wound healing process (Everts
et al., 2020). PRP, a plasma variant
enriched with growth factors crucial for wound recovery, promises enhanced
healing capabilities. However, there exists a divergence of opinion regarding
its effectiveness and safety (De
Angelis et al., 2019).
Given this
context, a meta-analysis becomes essential to systematically review and assess
the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of PRP treatments for
prolonged wound healing. In this meta-analysis, we will deeply explore the
available literature, focusing on randomized controlled trial studies that have
investigated the impact of PRP treatments on chronic wound healing. Our goal is
to present a clear picture of PRP's overall effectiveness, identify potential
factors influencing treatment outcomes, and provide a comprehensive review of its
safety profile through meta-analysis. Additionally, we will discuss the
application of PRP in the form of dressings and local injections, both
synthetically and qualitatively in a narrative format.
In conclusion,
chronic wounds involve a complex interaction of various physiological
processes, making the quest for effective treatments paramoun (Wallace
et al., 2019). As PRP treatments gain momentum
in clinical settings, this meta-analysis seeks to offer an evidence-based
perspective on their role in chronic wound management, paving the way for
informed clinical practice and future research directions.
This study
aims to systematically identify the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma
clothing in accelerating chronic wound healing. In addition, this study also
aims to analyze the variability of existing research results, provide
up-to-date information, and provide guidance for further development. For
researchers, this research contributes to scientific understanding, development
of research methodology skills, and improvement of scientific literature
through synthesis of current information and in-depth analysis.
The benefits
of this research can also be felt by the community. This research can provide a
deeper understanding for health care providers regarding the effectiveness of
platelet-rich plasma clothing in the treatment of chronic wounds. In addition,
by providing new treatment options, this research can be an alternative that
has the potential to help patients who have not achieved satisfactory results
through conventional methods. Overall, this research has the potential to
reduce the duration of chronic wound healing, reduce the burden of disease on
individuals, and optimize health resources to improve people's well-being.
METHOD
The research
followed the guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Reviewers scoured various electronic
databases to identify related publications. These databases include Embase,
PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. To begin the
review process, the researchers scrutinized the titles and summaries of the
identified studies. Subsequently, a comprehensive review of the full articles
was undertaken to gather detailed data. The study used a quantitative
comparison of PRP Dressing with a control group, where control could consist of
standard wound care, placebo, or no treatment, with measurable results. In our
meta-analysis, patient data were independently gathered by two separate
reviewers. They collected demographic details such as the medical institution,
lead author, year of publication, sample size for each study, average age of
participants, follow-up intervals, and criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The
OR was derived by collating data on the total participants in each group and
identifying those who experienced the specified event. The synthesis of the
study data employed a random-effects model via the Mantel-Haenszel approach.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
During the
comprehensive search conducted by the reviewers across electronic databases, a
substantial number of 2044 potential articles emerged for review. After
refining the search based on specific criteria, a select list of 52 articles
was obtained. The primary focus of the meta-analysis was on studies that delved
into the effectiveness of specific treatments for chronic wounds. The
assessment predominantly revolved around studies that juxtaposed the treatment
against a control group, which could range from standard wound care protocols
to placebos or even the absence of any treatment. The chief outcomes gauged
included the rate of wound closure, the duration required for healing, and the
extent of wound size reduction. As depicted in Figure 1, out of the 52
shortlisted articles, 17 met the rigorous inclusion criteria and were
ultimately selected for the meta-analysis.
A.
Article Search Result
Table
1 Characteristics of Included Studies
Author
(year) |
Methodology |
Etiology |
Outcome |
(El-Sayed A. Abd El-Mabood, 2020) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Total
closure, rate of recovery, infection susceptibility, pain and discomfort |
(Ahmed et al., 2017) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Total
closure, rate of recovery, infection susceptibility |
(Amato et al., 2020) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Rate
of recovery |
(Burgos-alonso et al., n.d.) |
RCT |
Mixed |
Reduction
of wound area, total closure, pain and discomfort |
(Burgos-alonso et al., n.d.) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decrease
in wound size, full healing, infection risk, discomfort, negative outcomes,
and overall well-being |
(Escamilla Cardeñosa et al., 2017) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decreased
wound size, less pain, and fewer negative occurrences. |
(Chandanwale et al., 2020) |
RCT |
Arterial |
Decreased
wound size |
(M. G. De Oliveira et al., 2017) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decreased
wound size and Infection susceptibility |
(Elbarbary et al., 2020) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decreased
wound size, Infection susceptibility Total closure, rate of recovery |
(Elgarhy et al., 2020) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decreased
wound size, full closure, and faster healing. |
(Goda, 2018) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decreased
wound size and full closure |
(Gude et al., 2019) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Total
closure and amputation |
(Helmy et al., 2021) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decrease
wound size, rate of recovery, pain and discomfort |
(Karimi et al., 2016) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Decrease
wound size, total closure and quality of life |
(Li, L.; Chen, D.; Wang, C.; Yuan, N.; Wang, Y.; He,
L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, G.; Li, 2014) |
RCT |
Diabetic |
Decrease
in wound size, total closure, rate of recovery, infection susceptibility |
(Miłek et al., 2019) |
RCT |
Venous |
Decrease
wound size and total closure |
(Obolenskiy et al., 2017) |
RCT |
Mixed |
Rate
of recovery and total closure |
(Singh et al., 2021) |
RCT |
Pressure |
Decrease
wound size |
The
table presents a detailed breakdown of 17 rigorously selected articles used in
the meta-analysis. Each entry specifies the author and publication year, followed
by the research methodology, primarily RCTs (Randomized Control Trials). The
etiology column illustrates the type of wound or condition under investigation,
ranging from diabetic and venous to arterial and mixed etiologies. Lastly, the
outcome column lists the key results or observations from each study, including
parameters such as wound closure rate, size reduction, rate of recovery, and
factors like pain, discomfort, infection susceptibility, and overall
well-being. The varied outcomes across these studies provide a comprehensive
overview of the treatment's effectiveness under different conditions and
settings.
B. Meta-Analysis
Result
Figure 1 Forest Plot For Total Closure
Breaking down
the specifics, each study lists the number of events for both the intervention
(PRP
Dressing) and control
groups. The assigned weights for individual studies ranged widely, with studies
by researchers holding substantial weights above 10% (Ahmed
et al., 2017; Amato et al., 2020; Helmy et al., 2021). This might be due to the sample size, study design, or the
precision of the effect estimate.
The odds
ratio, a pivotal metric in this analysis, quantifies the odds of wound healing
with PRP Dressing versus the control. A value greater than one suggests a
favorable outcome for PRP Dressing. As observed, the majority of the studies
show an odds ratio greater than one. Specifically, the study by researchers
yielded a particularly high odds ratio of 49.40, underscoring the profound
efficacy of PRP Dressing in that specific study setting (Obolenskiy
et al., 2017).
However, there
are outliers. For instance, the study by researchers indicated a more neutral
or even slightly unfavorable outcome for PRP Dressing, with an odds ratio of
0.84 (Karimi
et al., 2016). This emphasizes the
varied results across studies and the necessity for individual study scrutiny.
The combined
effect, as indicated by the diamond at the bottom of the forest plot, reveals a
definitive inclination towards PRP Dressing, with an overall odds ratio of
5.08, well encapsulated within the 95% Confidence Interval of 2.55 to 10.11.
It’s paramount to approach these findings with caution due to the significant
heterogeneity of I² = 69%. This substantial variance across the incorporated
studies suggests potential disparities in methodologies, wound etiologies,
patient demographics, or treatment protocols. It underscores the necessity for
standardized protocols in future research to draw more definitive conclusions.
In summation, while the meta-analysis distinctly showcases the potential
advantages of PRP Dressing for wound healing over control treatments, the
pronounced heterogeneity between studies necessitates careful interpretation
and underscores the need for further robust, standardized research in the
field.
C.
Comparative Effectiveness
of PRP dressing and PRP injection
Table 2 Comparison of Study About PRP dressing and PRP
Injection
Parameter |
(Tsai
et al., 2019) - PRP Dressing |
(Qian
et al., 2020) - Injectable PRP Hydrogel |
Methodology |
PRP applied as a dressing to wounds. |
Hydrogel containing PRP and is
injectable. |
Problem Addressed |
Chronic wounds; focusing on diabetes. |
Diabetic wounds; issue with the rapid
degradation of PRP in diabetic wounds. |
Key Outcomes |
a) Improved
healing within 2 weeks. b) Drastic
reduction in wound size by the 4th week for diabetic patients. |
a)
Protects PRP from enzymatic hydrolysis. b)
Sustained release of PRP. c)
Enhances the chemotaxis of mesenchymal stem
cells. d)
Enhances the proliferation of repair cells in
vitro. e)
Accelerates healing by promoting collagen
deposition, angiogenesis, and nerve repair in diabetic rat models. |
Application & Efficacy |
PRP applied in the form of a
dressing. |
PRP injected in the form of a
hydrogel with sustained release. |
Chronic
wounds, notably aggravated by diabetic conditions, have compelled extensive
research, with researchers offering key insights (Choudhury
et al., 2020). Researchers illuminated
the profound impacts of PRP dressings, recording significant wound healing in a
fortnight and a substantial wound size reduction by the fourth week for
diabetic patients (Gibello
et al., 2023). This evidence
accentuates PRP dressing as a viable solution for diabetic wound challenges.
In
juxtaposition, researchers pivoted towards a hydrogel's role, designed
meticulously to protect PRP from degradation prevalent in a protease-rich
diabetic milieu. Although exact healing rates weren't presented, the study
highlighted the hydrogel's capability to ensure prolonged growth factor
release, pivotal for healing, and its ability to enhance other healing
processes. This positions hydrogels as potential accelerators of wound closure (Makvandi
et al., 2019).
Surveying the
broader literature reveals several studies comparing PRP dressing and
injection, each aiming to deduce the superior method for wound management.
Variances were observed in their results. For instance, Tsai's work emphasized
the swift epithelialization facilitated by PRP dressings, especially for
diabetic patients. On the other hand, some studies, akin to Qian's, vouched for
injected PRP's effectiveness, especially when combined with hydrogels,
emphasizing its long-term healing effects.
Further
analysis on wound size reduction presented an evident dichotomy: PRP dressings
promised swift results, while PRP injections, propelled by hydrogels, promised
gradual yet consistent healing over time. Patient-reported outcomes added
another layer to the analysis. Tsai's work, while highlighting rapid healing,
remained silent on pain relief metrics (Fenwick
et al., 2020). However, logic suggests
that quicker healing might be synonymous with enhanced patient comfort.
Injected PRP's sustained release, meanwhile, hinted at lasting relief, even if
direct testimonials were sparse.
Certain
research underscored PRP dressings' immediacy in effect, influenced possibly by
varied patient demographics or wound types. One even heralded PRP dressing as a
primary therapeutic tool for diabetic wounds. In contrast, studies inclined
towards injected PRP accentuated its prolonged therapeutic utility,
highlighting variables like PRP concentration, injection techniques, and
patient demographics as influential factors.
To
encapsulate, both PRP dressings and injections hold considerable therapeutic
potential. Their efficacy, however, may be contingent on wound specifics,
patient conditions, and overarching therapeutic goals. Platelet Rich Plasma
(PRP) has garnered increasing attention in the medical community as a potential
modality for wound healing (Qian
et al., 2020). PRP is a concentration
of platelets derived from the patient's own blood. It contains various growth
factors that can stimulate tissue regeneration, promote angiogenesis, and
reduce inflammation, which are all essential processes in wound healing (Gentile
& Garcovich, 2020).
From the
quantitative analysis, PRP Dressing demonstrates a favorable effect over the
control in promoting chronic wound healing. The mechanism behind this is
thought to be the release of growth factors from activated platelets present in
PRP, which accelerates the wound healing process (Yamakawa
& Hayashida, 2019).
However, it's
essential to consider the qualitative analysis. Comparing PRP Dressing vs.
locally injected PRP for chronic wound healing offers a broader perspective.
While PRP Dressing provides a sustained release of growth factors directly to
the wound site, locally injected PRP may offer a deeper penetration of these
factors into the tissue (O’Connell
et al., 2019). The ideal method might
depend on the wound's depth, size, and type.
The
significant heterogeneity among studies indicates the need for standardized
protocols in PRP preparation, application, and measurement outcomes (Dai
et al., 2017). Future research should
aim to optimize the PRP concentration, establish the best mode of application,
and determine which types of wounds benefit most from PRP (Chung
et al., 2019). In conclusion, while PRP
Dressing appears promising for chronic wound healing, clinicians should
consider individual patient characteristics and the wound's nature when
choosing between PRP Dressing and locally injected PRP. As with all medical
interventions, a tailored approach will likely yield the best results.
Navigating the
intricate realm of PRP applications necessitates a discerning approach. For
surface-level wounds or those requiring immediate intervention, PRP dressings
emerge as the frontrunners, attributed to their ease of application and rapid
results. They prove especially beneficial in patient cohorts where invasive
procedures might pose heightened risks, such as the elderly or those with
compromised immunity. In contrast, deeper or more extensive wounds might
benefit more from injected PRP (Elbarbary
et al., 2020). Its ability to directly
introduce growth factors into deeper tissue layers ensures a comprehensive
healing environment. Clinicians must also weigh the potential risks associated
with injections, especially in sensitive regions. An integrative approach,
understanding individual patient needs, wound specifics, and the overarching
therapeutic goals, will be paramount in harnessing PRP's potential optimally.
Decisions should be anchored in robust evidence, always prioritizing patient
safety and comfort.
CONCLUSION
In the quantitative analysis of PRP Dressing versus control
for chronic wound healing, the meta-analysis clearly indicates a preference
towards PRP Dressing. The majority of the RCTs reviewed show favorable outcomes
for wound healing with PRP Dressing, as evidenced by a predominant odds ratio
greater than one. The overall odds ratio of 5.08, encompassed within the 95% CI
of 2.55 to 10.11, further reinforces the potential benefits of PRP Dressing.
Nonetheless, it's pivotal to consider the significant heterogeneity observed
across the studies, emphasizing the need for future research with standardized
methodologies for consistent and definitive conclusions.
On the
qualitative front, comparing PRP Dressing and injected PRP for chronic wound
healing presents a nuanced picture. Both methods demonstrate considerable
therapeutic promise. PRP Dressing showcases rapid wound healing, particularly
in diabetic patients, leading to swift results in terms of wound size
reduction. Injected PRP, especially when combined with hydrogels, suggests a
more sustained healing process, promoting long-term therapeutic benefits like
collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and nerve repair. The optimal choice between
PRP Dressing and injections likely hinges on specific wound conditions, patient
demographics, and overarching therapeutic objectives. In summary, while PRP
Dressing emerges as a potent contender against traditional controls for wound
healing, the choice between PRP Dressing and injected PRP necessitates a more
individualized approach based on specific clinical scenarios and patient needs.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, M.,
Reffat, S. A., Hassan, A., & Eskander, F. (2017). Platelet-Rich Plasma for
the Treatment of Clean Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 38, 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.023
Amato, B.,
Farina, M. A., Campisi, S., Ciliberti, M., Di Donna, V., Florio, A., Grasso,
A., Miranda, R., Pompeo, F., Farina, E., Serra, R., Cirocchi, R., Calemma, F.,
Rocca, A., & Compagna, R. (2020). CGF treatment of leg ulcers: A randomized
controlled trial. Open Medicine
(Poland), 14(1),
959–967. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0113
Bowers, S., &
Franco, E. (2020). Chronic wounds: evaluation and management. American Family Physician, 101(3), 159–166.
Burgos-alonso,
N., Lobato, I., Sebastian, K. S., Perez-salvador, A., Arce, V., Garcia-alvarez,
A., Gomez-fernandez, M. C., Grandes, G., Andia, I., & Service, B. H.
(n.d.). Autologous platelet-rich
plasma in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in primary care: A randomised
controlled, pilot study. 20–24.
Chandanwale, K.
A., Mahakalkar, C. C., Kothule, A. K., & Khithani, D. V. (2020). Management
of Wounds of Peripheral Arterial Disease Using Platelet Rich Plasma. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental
Sciences, 9(31),
2239–2245. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/486
Choudhury, H.,
Pandey, M., Lim, Y. Q., Low, C. Y., Lee, C. T., Marilyn, T. C. L., Loh, H. S.,
Lim, Y. P., Lee, C. F., & Bhattamishra, S. K. (2020). Silver nanoparticles:
Advanced and promising technology in diabetic wound therapy. Materials Science and Engineering: C,
112, 110925.
Chung, P.-Y.,
Lin, M.-T., & Chang, H.-P. (2019). Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma
injection in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: a systematic
review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology
and Oral Radiology, 127(2),
106–116.
Dai, W.-L., Zhou,
A.-G., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in
the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled
trials. Arthroscopy: The Journal of
Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 33(3), 659–670.
De Angelis, B.,
D’Autilio, M. F. L. M., Orlandi, F., Pepe, G., Garcovich, S., Scioli, M. G.,
Orlandi, A., Cervelli, V., & Gentile, P. (2019). Wound healing: in vitro
and in vivo evaluation of a bio-functionalized scaffold based on hyaluronic
acid and platelet-rich plasma in chronic ulcers. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(9), 1486.
El-Sayed A. Abd
El-Mabood, H. E. A. (2020). Platelet-rich
plasma versus conventional dressing: does this really affect diabetic foot
wound-healing outcomes? 920–925. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs
Elbarbary, A. H.,
Hassan, H. A., & Elbendak, E. A. (2020). Autologous platelet-rich plasma
injection enhances healing of chronic venous leg ulcer: A prospective
randomised study. International Wound
Journal, 17(4),
992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13361
Elgarhy, L. H.,
El-Ashmawy, A. A., Bedeer, A. E., & Al-bahnasy, A. M. (2020). Evaluation of
safety and efficacy of autologous topical platelet gel vs platelet rich plasma
injection in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: A randomized case control
study. Dermatologic Therapy, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13897
Escamilla
Cardeñosa, M., Domínguez-Maldonado, G., & Córdoba-Fernández, A. (2017).
Efficacy and safety of the use of platelet-rich plasma to manage venous ulcers.
Journal of Tissue Viability, 26(2), 138–143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2016.11.003
Everts, P.,
Onishi, K., Jayaram, P., Lana, J. F., & Mautner, K. (2020). Platelet-rich
plasma: new performance understandings and therapeutic considerations in 2020. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,
21(20), 7794.
Falanga, V.,
Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S.,
Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022). Chronic wounds. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 8(1), 50.
Fenwick, E. K.,
Man, R. E. K., Aung, T., Ramulu, P., & Lamoureux, E. L. (2020). Beyond
intraocular pressure: optimizing patient-reported outcomes in glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research,
76, 100801.
Gentile, P.,
& Garcovich, S. (2020). Systematic review—the potential implications of
different platelet-rich plasma (PRP) concentrations in regenerative medicine
for tissue repair. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(16),
5702.
Gibello, L.,
D’Antico, S., Salafia, M., Senetta, R., Pomatto, M. A. C., Orlando, G.,
Sarcinella, A., Lopatina, T., Quaglino, P., & Lorenzi, M. (2023). First
pilot case-control interventional study using autologous extracellular vesicles
to treat chronic venous ulcers unresponsive to conventional treatments. Pharmacological Research, 190, 106718.
Goda, A. (2018).
Autogenous leucocyte-rich and platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of leg
venous ulcer: a randomized control study. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 37(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-1121.239205
Goldberg, S. R.,
& Diegelmann, R. F. (2020). What makes wounds chronic. Surgical Clinics, 100(4), 681–693.
Gude, W., Hagan,
D., Abood, F., & Clausen, P. (2019). Aurix Gel Is an Effective Intervention
for Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Advances
in Skin & Wound Care, 32(9),
416–426.
Gupta, S., Sagar,
S., Maheshwari, G., Kisaka, T., & Tripathi, S. (2021). Chronic wounds: Magnitude,
socioeconomic burden and consequences. Wounds
Asia, 4(1), 8–14.
Harika, K.,
Shenoy, V. P., Narasimhaswamy, N., & Chawla, K. (2020). Detection of
biofilm production and its impact on antibiotic resistance profile of bacterial
isolates from chronic wound infections. Journal
of Global Infectious Diseases, 12(3),
129.
Helmy, Y.,
Farouk, N., Ali Dahy, A., Abu-Elsoud, A., Fouad khattab, R., Elshahat Mohammed,
S., Abdullbary Gad, L., Altramsy, A., Hussein, E., & Farahat, A. (2021).
Objective assessment of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) potentiality in the
treatment of Chronic leg Ulcer: RCT on 80 patients with Venous ulcer. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20(10), 3257–3263.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14138
Karimi, R.,
Afshar, M., Salimian, M., Sharif, A., & Hidariyan, M. (2016). The Effect of
Platelet Rich Plasma Dressing on Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 5(3).
https://doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal30314
Klein, T. M.,
Andrees, V., Kirsten, N., Protz, K., Augustin, M., & Blome, C. (2021).
Social participation of people with chronic wounds: A systematic review. International Wound Journal, 18(3), 287–311.
Li, L.; Chen, D.;
Wang, C.; Yuan, N.; Wang, Y.; He, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, G.; Li, X.
(2014). Autologous platelet-rich gel for treatment of diabetic chronic
refractory cutaneous ulcers: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. The Laryngoscope, 44(0), 2–31.
Makvandi, P.,
Ali, G. W., Della Sala, F., Abdel-Fattah, W. I., & Borzacchiello, A.
(2019). Biosynthesis and characterization of antibacterial thermosensitive
hydrogels based on corn silk extract, hyaluronic acid and nanosilver for
potential wound healing. Carbohydrate
Polymers, 223, 115023.
Miłek, T.,
Nagraba, Ł., Mitek, T., Woźniak, W., Mlosek, K., Olszewski, W.,
Ciostek, P., Deszczyński, J., Kuchar, E., & Stolarczyk, A. (2019).
Autologous platelet-rich plasma reduces healing time of chronic venous leg
ulcers: a prospective observational study. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1176, 109–117.
https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2019_388
O’Connell, B.,
Wragg, N. M., & Wilson, S. L. (2019). The use of PRP injections in the
management of knee osteoarthritis. Cell
and Tissue Research, 376,
143–152.
Obolenskiy, V.
N., Ermolova, D. A., & Laberko, L. A. (2017). Clinical and economic
effectiveness of the use of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of chronic
wounds. Wound Medicine, 19, 27–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.09.001
Oliveira, A. C.
de, Rocha, D. de M., Bezerra, S. M. G., Andrade, E. M. L. R., Santos, A. M. R.
dos, & Nogueira, L. T. (2019). Quality of life of people with chronic
wounds. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem,
32, 194–201.
Oliveira, M. G.
De, Deffune, E., Patricia, L., & Abbade, F. (2017). Pilot study of homologous platelet gel in venous ulcers. 92(4), 499–504.
Qian, Z., Wang,
H., Bai, Y., Wang, Y., Tao, L., Wei, Y., Fan, Y., Guo, X., & Liu, H.
(2020). Improving Chronic Diabetic Wound Healing through an Injectable and
Self-Healing Hydrogel with Platelet-Rich Plasma Release. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces,
12(50), 55659–55674.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17142
Raziyeva, K.,
Kim, Y., Zharkinbekov, Z., Kassymbek, K., Jimi, S., & Saparov, A. (2021).
Immunology of acute and chronic wound healing. Biomolecules, 11(5),
700.
Sen, C. K.
(2019). Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates. In Advances in wound care (Vol. 8, Issue
2, pp. 39–48). Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 140 Huguenot Street, 3rd
Floor New ….
Singh, G., Borah,
D., Khanna, G., & Jain, S. (2021). Efficacy of Local Autologous
Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcer in Spinal Cord Injury
Patients. Cureus, 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18668
Tsai, H. C.,
Lehman, C. W., & Chen, C. M. (2019). Use of platelet-rich plasma and
platelet-derived patches to treat chronic wounds. Journal of Wound Care, 28(1),
15–21. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.1.15
Verbanic, S.,
Shen, Y., Lee, J., Deacon, J. M., & Chen, I. A. (2020). Microbial
predictors of healing and short-term effect of debridement on the microbiome of
chronic wounds. NPJ Biofilms and
Microbiomes, 6(1), 21.
Wallace, L. A.,
Gwynne, L., & Jenkins, T. (2019). Challenges and opportunities of pH in
chronic wounds. Therapeutic Delivery,
10(11), 719–735.
Wu, Y.-K., Cheng,
N.-C., & Cheng, C.-M. (2019). Biofilms in chronic wounds: pathogenesis and
diagnosis. Trends in Biotechnology,
37(5), 505–517.
Yamakawa, S.,
& Hayashida, K. (2019). Advances in surgical applications of growth factors
for wound healing. Burns & Trauma,
7, s41038-019.
©
2023 by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication
under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |