THE EFFECT OF ORIENTATION ON INCREASING KNOWLEDGE AND
REDUCING ANXIETY DURING MRI EXAMINATION IN A RADIOLOGY INSTALLATION
Ernawidiarti1, Haryanto Sidin2,
Fatimah3
Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Semarang, Central Java,
Indonesia
|
KEYWORDS |
ABSTRACT |
|
Orientation,
Knowledge, Anxiety, Cortisol, MRI Examination |
Radiology
services encompass the use of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation sources for
diagnostic imaging and therapy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a crucial
clinical radiology service, primarily conducted in hospital-based healthcare
facilities. The aim of this research is to assess the influence of patient orientation
on MRI-related knowledge and anxiety. This study employs a quasi-experimental
design with pretest and posttest measurements, taking into account variables
such as age, gender, education, diagnosis, and experience. The results of the
research indicate that patient orientation effectively reduces anxiety levels
and has a positive impact on the patient's experience during MRI
examinations. The conclusions that can be drawn from this research are: The
influence of orientation on knowledge in groups that were not given
orientation and orientation found that there was no significant difference in
the average knowledge before and after orientation (p>0.05), this was
because respondents had previously read first about MRI examinations on the
internet and after reading the knowledge questionnaire their knowledge
increased because after they filled out the questionnaire they asked the
researchers what was stated in the knowledge questionnaire. The research
suggests that the use of open MRI machines with wider bore diameters, along
with patient-oriented practices such as allowing patients to see during the
examination, can reduce anxiety. |
|
DOI: 10.58860/ijsh.v2i10.110 |
|
Corresponding Author: Ernawidiarti
Email: ernakewet@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Clinical
radiology services are health services that use ionizing and non-ionizing
radiation sources for image-based diagnosis and/or therapy (SULTAN,
2018) . Magnetic Resonance
Imaging (MRI) is a mid-level clinical radiology service that is only carried
out in hospital-based health care facilities (Health,
2020). MRI examination is
classified as a sophisticated examination modality and is one of the most
important diagnostic tools in the medical field, however it takes quite a long
time compared to a CT-Scan examination, some patients feel afraid and anxious
during the examination. (Yakar
& Pirinçci, 2020)
Anxiety cannot
be known before the examination, often occurs when several sequences have been
carried out, the patient then screams or presses the emergency button asking
for the examination to be stopped for reasons of fear, because they feel
confined or closed, which can have an impact on work flow such as limiting
patient acceptance of MRI, and wasting scan time for the next patient. (Shimokawa
et al., 2022) Patient anxiety is a
common problem in the Radiology department, when patients come for MRI. The
cause of anxiety during the examination occurs due to the closed nature of the
MRI scanner which causes claustrophobic reactions, anxiety regarding the
results, or having to remain silent for a long time when feeling sick or
uncomfortable, but the level of anxiety still occurs to a certain limit (low or
high), namely more than 50 % patient. (Munn
et al., 2015)
The most
frequent sources of anxiety were inability to move (65%), length of procedure
(61%), size of scanner “tunnel” (48%), and feeling confined (44%). At the
beginning of the discovery of the MRI gantry hole, it used a closed/traditional
hole with a diameter of 23.6 inches or 60 cm. However, as time goes by, other
options have become available, such as MRI with a wide aperture measuring 70
cm. Unlike X-rays or Computed Tomography (CT) scans, MRI is a longer procedure.
An MRI can take between 15 to 90 minutes to get proper images. Usually, the
best option for very claustrophobic patients is to use an open MRI machine.
patients with a diameter of 70 cm rated their examination experience as better
(p < 0.025), compared with patients with a diameter of 60 cm and with an
open scanner there was a higher level of anxiety (p < 0.001) before the
examination. (Ahlander
et al., 2020) Today almost all brands
create mirrors mounted on the head coil, which can be removed and installed, so
that the patient can see the operator and vice versa, they serve to reduce the
patient's claustrophobia and anxiety, ensuring less downtime and improve
patient examination results. However, in reality, anxiety is still found in MRI
patients, which is characterized by increased levels of cortisol in the body (Madl
et al., 2022).
Based on
patient characteristics, anxiety in MRI patients in middle age is more
significantly experiencing claustrophobia, 33% in the group of late adolescents
17-25 years (Amaliya
et al., 2019) , adults experiencing
moderate to moderate anxiety. weight as much as 69.6% (Asriningrum
et al., 2020). Gender: anxiety levels are
higher in women than men (Asriningrum
et al., 2020) , (Madl
et al., 2022) , (Ahlander
et al., 2020) .
Effective
communication between patients and providers has become imperative in
radiological diagnosis. Therefore, radiographers as experts must remain
sensitive to the physical and emotional needs of patients through good
communication, patient care skills, and behavior in accordance with the code of
ethics. A radiologist's ethical responsibilities include respecting patients
and treating them with dignity, as well as maintaining patient privacy and
confidentiality. (Ochonma
et al., 2015)
Acute anxiety
that can prevent completion of the examination is approximately 2%, this is
caused by substantial problems, namely the scanning procedure and the
environment, both those who report anxiety directly and the number of scans
that are stopped prematurely (O’Laughlin
et al., 2021).
As many as 30%
of patients experienced moderate to severe anxiety, and required repeat scans
and took longer for the MRI examination. It was also found that patients who
were very anxious (as many as 2 people) tended to only lie down on the MRI
examination table for a short time and moved more, which could trigger
artifacts. Caused by movement (motion artifacts) and repeated scanning, which
can lengthen the time of the examination procedure (McGraw,
2022) .
The MRI
examination causes severe anxiety in 37% of patients, 5-10% cannot complete the
MRI due to claustrophobia where patients cannot cooperate because they feel
"buried alive and left alone in the examination room", resulting in a
decrease in image quality due to induced artifacts movement, prolonging the
examination time and even requiring sedation or general anesthesia in
claustrophobic patients, which will increase the cost of the examination. (Yakar
& Pirinçci, 2020)
Research
conducted overseas (Ghana) states that the availability of MRI facilities,
level of education can influence patient knowledge and experience about MRI
(significance P < 0.05). In men and women, there was a weak correlation
between age, sosiodemografi and knowledge about MRI, a strong correlation was
found between knowledge and patient experience which influenced anxiety,
claustrophobia, headaches and loneliness during the MRI procedure (Asante
& Acheampong, 2020).
Meanwhile,
based on research conducted in Indonesia, it was stated that there was no
relationship between patient knowledge and anxiety level (p-value 0.059) with
the sufficient correlation coefficient category (Desry,
2021). At general hospital Dr.
Mohammad Hoesin Palembang MRI examination is a supporting examination which is
very useful in establishing a diagnosis and is used as a comparison modality if
there is still doubt in carrying out an action plan. In one day, the average
number of MRI patients is 18 patients with various types of examinations, and
the characteristics of the patients are different, some have low education and
some have high levels of education and for those who are doing an MRI
examination for the first time, these patients feel afraid and anxious so they
can resulting in failure and disrupting the inspection process.
The
researchers conducted a similar investigation focusing on the impact of
pre-procedure education and orientation on patient anxiety levels (Aboalizm
et al., 2016). Their results
demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety when patients were adequately
informed about the MRI procedure beforehand, which aligns with our findings.
Next research
emphasized the importance of patient-centered care and the role of clear
communication in reducing anxiety during medical procedures (Hong
& Oh, 2020). Their research
highlights the significance of addressing patient concerns and providing
informative sessions, which were aspects we considered in our orientation
program. Based on research that has been carried out by previous researchers
and the experiences that researchers have had at the place where the researcher
works, the researcher is interested in conducting research on the influence of
knowledge on patient anxiety during MRI examinations at the radiology installation
at general hospital Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang.
The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of
orientation on the level of knowledge and anxiety during MRI examinations at
the Radiology Installation at general hospital Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang. This research is useful for
improving knowledge in MRI examinations.The results of this study indicate that
providing orientation to patients before the MRI examination can reduce their
anxiety. This has positive implications on better patient experience during
medical procedures.
METHOD
Research is
quasi experimental research (quasi experiment). The research design uses a
pretest and posttest with a control group design. Research variables include
knowledge, anxiety and cortisol measured based on characteristics (age, gender,
education, disease diagnosis and experience). Sampling was carried out using
purposive sampling technique. The target population in
this study was all patients who underwent an MRI examination at the
Radiology Installation of general hospital Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang. The
samples in this study were patients who underwent an MRI examination at the
Radiology Installation at general hospital Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang. The
research was carried out in May 2023 – July 2023
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of
this research consist of 5 (five) main steps of the Research and Development
(R&D) method, namely, the analysis stage (Analysis), the product design
stage (Design Product), the validation or evaluation stage (Evaluation), the
Implementation stage (Implementation) and the product results (Product
Results).
Results of Workload
Calculation and Arrangement of Radiographer
Human Resources (HR)
The NOVITA
formula is a development design for modifying workload calculations and
preparing human resource (HR) requirements for radiographers from two methods,
namely the Work Indicator Of Staffing Need (WISN) Method and the Ilyas Formula,
the Work Indicator Of Staffing Need (WISN) method is a method to calculate
labor requirements based on the actual workload carried out by the workforce (WISN
Formula, 2016) while the Ilyas Formula is
a method for calculating health human resource requirements (HRK) by
classifying individual workloads (Hartawan
& Ilyas, 2020) . NOVITA's formula in
preparing radiographer requirements follows BAPETEN Head Regulation Number
21/Ka-BAPETEN/XII.02 concerning clinical radiology services with minimum
personnel requirements (Riyanto,
2017).
Dr. Hospital
H. Abdul Moeloek Lampung Province is a hospital owned by the regional
government of Lampung Province which is a type A hospital and is also a
teaching hospital (Lampung
Governor Regulation Number 40 of 2016, 2016) , stated in the Decree of the Hospital Director Number
180/7.H/VII.02/10.27/X/2022. Based on the results of observations and document
review, namely, Decree of the Main Director Number 180/VII.02/10.27/X/2022 on
October 5 2022, the Radiotherapy Unit at RSUD Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Lampung
Province has 4 (four) radiotherapy modalities, namely:
Linear Accelerator (LINAC)
Linear
Accelerator (LINAC) is a LINAC radiotherapy is a type of external radiation
therapy that uses a linear accelerator to produce high-energy X-rays or
electrons to cancer cells (RI,
2020). Linear Accelerator (LINAC)
at RSUD Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Lampung Province has been operating and is
entering its second (second) year, based on the results of the 2022 performance
and quality report on quality indicators for patients, which are completed at
70 to 80 patients per day.
CT Simulator
CT Simulator is a tool
used in radiotherapy planning to
produce detailed images of the area to be treated (Kasmudin,
2021) . The following are the
results of the 2022 performance and quality report on quality indicators for
patients completed in radiotherapy planning, namely the CT Simulator for 18 to 20 patients per day with the following
details:
a)
CT Simulator Cranium
area.
b)
CT Simulator
Cervical area.
c)
CT simulator of the
thorax area.
d)
CT Simulator
abdominal – pelvic area.
e)
CT Simulator for the
Extremity area
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy is an internal radiation
activity that places radiation material directly on the area to be treated (Kasmudin,
2021). There are 2 (two) radiographers in the brachytherapy room and the patient
limit is 3 – 5 per day. Results of the 2022 performance and quality report on
quality indicators in the radiotherapy
unit starting brachytherapy for types of gynecological malignancies, namely cervical cancer and endometrial
cancer.
C-ARM
C-ARM in radiotherapy
functions to support medical services, in quality indicators in 2022 for
patients who complete 4 to 10 patients per day.
The following is a description of the
activities of 4 (four) radiotherapy modalities
at RSUD Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Lampung Province from the 2022 quality indicators
report.
Table 1 Description of Radiotherapy Modalities
Dr. Hospital H. Abdul Moeloek Lampung Province
|
Type of Tool Modality |
Number of HR in
Radiotherapy |
Number of Patients in
Radiotherapy |
BAPETEN minimum
requirements |
||
|
Linear Accelerator ( LINAC ) |
4 |
80 Patients/day |
25 Patients/day |
|
|
|
CT Simulator |
2 |
20 Patients/day |
500 Patients/year |
|
|
|
Brachytherapy |
2 |
5 Patients/day |
According to needs and type of
treatment |
|
|
|
C-ARM |
2 |
Patients/day |
300– 400 Patients/year |
|
|
CONCLUSION
The
conclusions that can be drawn from this research are: The influence of
orientation on knowledge in groups that were not given orientation and
orientation found that there was no significant difference in the average
knowledge before and after orientation (p>0.05), this was because
respondents had previously read first about MRI examinations on the internet
and after reading the knowledge questionnaire their knowledge increased because
after they filled out the questionnaire they asked the researchers what was
stated in the knowledge questionnaire.
The effect of
orientation on anxiety in the group that was not given orientation was that
there was no significant difference in the average anxiety before and after the
examination (p> 0.05), this was because patients could not prepare
themselves from a state of anxiety towards a condition that was more
constructive in dealing with their problems, whereas the group orientation
showed a significant difference in anxiety before and after being given
orientation (p<0.05) because orientation for patients undergoing an MRI
examination for the first time had a significant influence on the patient's
ability to adapt to the examination room environment, in the form of
orientation to the room, image of the patient during an examination where
almost the entire body is included in the bore gantry, and the procedures they
must adhere to during the examination. There is a significant correlation
between anxiety and cortisol levels in the MRI examination in the group given
orientation (p=0.011) with a value of r=0.637, meaning the strength of the
correlation Meanwhile, with a positive correlation direction, this means that
the higher a person's knowledge, the higher their understanding of the MRI
examination and the lower their cortisol levels.
REFERENCES
aboalizm,
S. E., El Gahsh, N. F., & Masry, S. E. (2016). Effect Of Early Nursing
Preparation On Anxiety Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization. American Journal Of Nursing Science, 5(5), 222–231.
Ahlander,
B. M., Engvall, J., & Ericsson, E. (2020). Anxiety During Magnetic
Resonance Imaging Of The Spine In Relation To Scanner Design And Size. Radiography, 26(2), 110–116. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Radi.2019.09.003
Amaliya,
M. I., Setiawati, R., Sari, A. K., Muqmiroh, L., & Muhaimin, M. (2019).
Scoring Analysis Of The Relationship Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging-
Anxiety Questionnaire (Mri-Aq) With Heart Rate To Patients Anxiety Level At
Lumbosacral Mri Examination. Journal
Of Vocational Health Studies, 2(3),
112–117. Https://Doi.Org/10.20473/Jvhs.V2i3.2019.112-117
Asante,
S., & Acheampong, F. (2020). Radiography Patients ’ Knowledge , Perception
, And Experience During Magnetic Resonance Imaging In Ghana : A Single
Centre Study. Radiography, Xxxx.
Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Radi.2020.11.020
Asriningrum,
S., Ansory, K., & Hasan, T. P. (2020). Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik. Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik, 6, 51–59.
Desry,
R. (2021). Hubungan Pengetahuan Pasien
Tentang Mri Dengan Tingkat Kecemasan Pada Pemeriksaan Di Ruang Mri Rs Awal Bros
Pekanbaru. February, 6.
Formula
Wisn. (2016). Metode Penghitungan
Beban Kerja Wisn.
Hartawan,
I. G. A. G. U., & Ilyas, Y. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Perawat Berdasarkan
Pengamatan Terhadap Penanganan Pasien Dewasa Dan Anak-Anak Di Unit Gawat
Darurat Rumah Sakit Bali Royal. Medicina,
47(2), 116–125. Https://Doi.Org/10.15562/Medicina.V47i2.72
Hong,
H., & Oh, H. J. (2020). The Effects Of Patient-Centered Communication:
Exploring The Mediating Role Of Trust In Healthcare Providers. Health Communication, 35(4), 502–511.
Kasmudin.
(2021). Brakiterapi. 18, 18–28.
Kesehatan,
K. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2020
Tentang Pelayanan Radiologi Klinik. Jdid.
Madl,
J., Janka, R., Bay, S., & Rohleder, N. (2022). Mri As A Stressor: The
Psychological And Physiological Response Of Patients To Mri, Influencing
Factors, And Consequences. Journal Of
The American College Of Radiology, 19(3), 423–432.
Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jacr.2021.11.020
Mcgraw,
M. (2022). Stress, Anxiety Affect Mri Patients’ Experience, Imaging Workflow. Oncology Times, 44(6).
Munn,
Z., Pearson, A., Jordan, Z., Murphy, F., Pilkington, D., & Anderson, A.
(2015). Patient Anxiety And Satisfaction In A Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Department: Initial Results From An Action Research Study. Journal Of Medical Imaging And Radiation
Sciences, 46(1), 23–29.
Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jmir.2014.07.006
O’laughlin,
D. J., Strelow, B., Fellows, N., Kelsey, E., Peters, S., Stevens, J., &
Tweedy, J. (2021). Addressing Anxiety And Fear During The Female Pelvic
Examination. Journal Of Primary Care
& Community Health, 12,
2150132721992195.
Ochonma,
O. G., Eze, C. U., Eze, S. B., & Okaro, A. O. (2015). Patients’ Reaction To
The Ethical Conduct Of Radiographers And Staff Services As Predictors Of
Radiological Experience Satisfaction: A Cross-Sectional Study. Bmc Medical Ethics, 16(1), 1–9.
Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S12910-015-0062-4
Peraturan
Gubernur Lampung Nomor 40 Tahun 2016. (2016). Pola Tata Kelola Rs (Hospital Bylaws) Rsud Dr H Abdul Moeloek Provinsi
Lampung.
Ri,
K. (2020). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia Nomor Hk.01.07/Menkes/316/2020 (Vol. 8, Issue 75).
Riyanto,
I. (2017). Pacs Performance Analysis
In Hospital Radiology Unit.
Shimokawa,
K., Matsumoto, K., Yokota, H., Kobayashi, E., Hirano, Y., Masuda, Y., &
Uno, T. (2022). Anxiety Relaxation During Mri With A Patient-Friendly
Audiovisual System. Radiography,
28(3), 725–731.
Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Radi.2022.03.013
Sultan,
S. (2018). Analisis Mutu Pelayanan
Radiologi Pasien Rawat Jalan Di Rumah Sakit Tk. Ii Pelamonia Makassar.
Politeknik Stia Lan Makassar.
Yakar,
B., & Pirinçci, E. (2020). Investigation Of The Effect Of Written And
Visual Information On Anxiety Measured Before Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Which
Method Is Most Effective? Medicina
(Lithuania), 56(3).
Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Medicina56030136
|
©
2023 by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication under
the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA ) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
). |